Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NIL, Power Conferences & Hockey

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NIL, Power Conferences & Hockey

    Interesting article. Is this the future in hockey also?

    https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-yo...college-hockey

  • #2
    Originally posted by Sol Diablo View Post
    Interesting article. Is this the future in hockey also?

    https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-yo...college-hockey
    Hard to take an article seriously that doesn't know how many teams the B1G will have after adding the west coast 4. And everything after that is all fluff.
    Current NCAA D-I rinks I've been to:

    AHA:
    B1G: UMich, MSU, UMinn, Notre Dame, OSU, UWisc
    CCHA: BSU, BG, FSU, LSSU, MSU, MTU, NMU
    ECAC:
    HEA: UMass
    NCHC: Miami, UMD, UND, SCSU, WMU
    Independant: ASU


    Inactive: UAH, ASU, BSU, UMD, UND, NMU, Notre Dame

    Comment


    • #3
      I have to agree with Mr. Moose on this one. Very poorly written article in a national publication that doesn't even begin to analyze the possible long- and short-term implications. Primary impact is on football and hoops at this point but the bleedover into hockey has already started. Private schools, with a relatively few wealthy exceptions, IMO are just not going to be able to keep up with the Enormous State Universities when it comes to "buying" players. Exceptions for "big" privates like Southern Cal, Stanford, Notre Dame, Duke, etc. If NIL is going to drive blue chip hockey recruiting as it is already doing in other sports, I don't think schools like BC, BU, Northeastern, and the like--even Denver--can keep pace.

      And that's before we even get to the character and integrity of the game we all love.
      Last edited by Split-N; 08-23-2023, 09:51 AM.
      "Through the years, we ever will acclaim........"

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Split-N View Post
        I have to agree with Mr. Moose on this one. Very poorly written article in a national publication that doesn't even begin to analyze the possible long- and short-term implications. Primary impact is on football and hoops at this point but the bleedover into hockey has already started. Private schools, with a relatively few wealthy exceptions, IMO are just not going to be able to keep up with the Enormous State Universities when it comes to "buying" players. Exceptions for "big" privates like Southern Cal, Stanford, Notre Dame, Duke, etc. If NIL is going to drive blue chip hockey recruiting as it is already doing in other sports, I don't think schools like BC, BU, Northeastern, and the like--even Denver--can keep pace.

        And that's before we even get to the character and integrity of the game we all love.
        Glimmer of hope is that Collectives paying for play could help to lure guys who would otherwise be CHL bound, thereby making the NCAA more desirable for higher end draft picks - rising tide lifts all boats type of thing. The collectives making larger payments could also help to keep guys for joining the NHL as soon - fewer turnover on the top lines of P5 programs combined with the NCAA becoming more appealing to high end talent could lead to smaller programs getting better players.

        I think you are more than likely right, just trying to think optimistically of other potential results.

        Comment


        • #5
          Here's my question:

          Why is it legal for a kid to attend an NCAA school and get a big NIL deal, but not play two games for Val-d'Or?

          If we're letting kids make money (which is great!) why the continued ineligibility for kids who play in the CHL?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by AMC View Post
            Here's my question:

            Why is it legal for a kid to attend an NCAA school and get a big NIL deal, but not play two games for Val-d'Or?

            If we're letting kids make money (which is great!) why the continued ineligibility for kids who play in the CHL?
            The NCAA's reasoning is that the CHL has players signed to NHL deals; therefore the league contains professionals.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by sezenack View Post

              The NCAA's reasoning is that the CHL has players signed to NHL deals; therefore the league contains professionals.
              Austen Swankler says "hi."
              Current NCAA D-I rinks I've been to:

              AHA:
              B1G: UMich, MSU, UMinn, Notre Dame, OSU, UWisc
              CCHA: BSU, BG, FSU, LSSU, MSU, MTU, NMU
              ECAC:
              HEA: UMass
              NCHC: Miami, UMD, UND, SCSU, WMU
              Independant: ASU


              Inactive: UAH, ASU, BSU, UMD, UND, NMU, Notre Dame

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by moose97 View Post

                Austen Swankler says "hi."
                It was widely reported that Austen Swankler was mistakenly cleared by the NCAA. There has been no change in how the NCAA views the CHL

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by nodak651 View Post

                  Glimmer of hope is that Collectives paying for play could help to lure guys who would otherwise be CHL bound, thereby making the NCAA more desirable for higher end draft picks - rising tide lifts all boats type of thing. The collectives making larger payments could also help to keep guys for joining the NHL as soon - fewer turnover on the top lines of P5 programs combined with the NCAA becoming more appealing to high end talent could lead to smaller programs getting better players.

                  I think you are more than likely right, just trying to think optimistically of other potential results.
                  "You can't out-recruit money."
                  Russell Jaslow
                  [Former] SUNYAC Correspondent
                  U.S. College Hockey Online

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    At this point considering the NCAA an amateur league is just pure hilarity and I see no reason to continue the CHL exclusion
                    BS UML '04, PhD UConn '09

                    Jerseys I would like to have:
                    Skating Friar Jersey
                    AIC Yellowjacket Jersey w/ Yellowjacket logo on front
                    UAF Jersey w/ Polar Bear on Front
                    Army Black Knight logo jersey


                    NCAA Men's Division 1 Simulation Primer

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X