Originally posted by ClOuD 9
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
UNH Hockey 2023 Off Season Thread Turn and Face the Strange
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by HockeyRef View Post
What, no Stonehill? I'll be verrryyyy disappointed if we don't play Stonehill....When I started following the 'Cats in 2013 they were playing the likes of Michigan...Speaking of the Friendship 4 in Belfast (which for the first time this season it will be a women's tournament) Kohei Sato has signed with the Belfast Giants.Last edited by Snively65; 06-07-2023, 10:46 AM.
Comment
-
https://twitter.com/Hanson_Brothers/...020289/photo/1
Now there's your obligatory hockey content!!
Now, further on to the important stuff from e.cat, from the wilds of Woodstock ME ...
https://www.boston.com/news/the-bost...lson-fox-news/
Gotta love how the leftist tone of the Glob seeps through that quaint portrait of Deep Red Maine, not far from Conway NH.
How will Tucker fare on his own (or with Twitter) away from Fox? I dunno, 80+ million views in less than 24 hours ...
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/st...n%7Ctwcon%5Es1Sworn Enemy of the Perpetually Offended
Montreal Expos Forever ...
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snively65 View Post
I meant to reply earlier as I have not had any emails or phone calls from UNH hockey ticketing despite having purchased lots of single-game tickets over the years. Oh, maybe those are the phone numbers from all over Cow Hampsha that I do not recognize and my service provider labels as spam? But at least they could leave me a voicemail? Desperate times call for desperate measures?"...On To Victory, Forever Blue & White..."
Men's Hockey
ECAC Regular Season: 1 • ECAC Tournament: 1 • Hockey East Regular Season: 8 • Hockey East Tournament: 2
NCAA Appearances: 22 • Frozen Fours: 7 • 1999 & 2003 NCAA Runner Up
Women's Hockey
EAIAW Champions: 4 • ECAC Regular Season: 3 • ECAC Tournament: 5 • Hockey East Regular Season: 6 • Hockey East Tournament: 4
AWCHA Final Fours: 2 • NCAA Appearances: 5 • Frozen Fours: 2 • 1999 Runner Up
◄ 1998 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS ►
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuck Murray View PostHey Snives ... if it comes down to Bentley v. Holy Cross for HEA #12, I suspect we lose since HC is in the Women's door.
Holy Cross: maybe could play home games in 14,500-seat DCU Center only a couple miles from campus (compare with Yukon playing home games far away at Hartford Civic Center), better regular season and postseason records within AHA, already has HEA women’s Div 1 team, has other Div 1 teamsLast edited by Snively65; 06-07-2023, 11:51 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by snively65 View Post
“are you the cloud 9 on the uscho fan forum?”
”yes.”
”ok. Now get off the line. We need to make another call.”
"...On To Victory, Forever Blue & White..."
Men's Hockey
ECAC Regular Season: 1 • ECAC Tournament: 1 • Hockey East Regular Season: 8 • Hockey East Tournament: 2
NCAA Appearances: 22 • Frozen Fours: 7 • 1999 & 2003 NCAA Runner Up
Women's Hockey
EAIAW Champions: 4 • ECAC Regular Season: 3 • ECAC Tournament: 5 • Hockey East Regular Season: 6 • Hockey East Tournament: 4
AWCHA Final Fours: 2 • NCAA Appearances: 5 • Frozen Fours: 2 • 1999 Runner Up
◄ 1998 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS ►
- 1 like
Comment
-
Well, Damn, that goes against my conventional wisdom
The result, according to Berkery, shows that general managers could be undervaluing faceoff wins and costing their teams goals, points and jobs. He’s convinced at least one team to listen to a presentation of his research in the coming weeks, which he hopes will mark another advance in how the sport uses certain metrics to analyze success.
Berkery, a native of Herndon, Va., developed his hockey project along with Johns Hopkins students Chase Seibold, Justin Nam and Max Stevens as part of the school’s sports analytics research group. They set out to test the theory that faceoffs, which occur roughly 60 times per game, are undervalued in shaping puck possession between teams and could significantly influence the outcome of games.
“Our kind of rule of thumb is that if you can win six more faceoffs per game, you can add about 15 goals in production for free to your team’s bottom line. Six more faceoffs is kind of like a middle six forward,” Berkery said. “And with that significant impact on the table, we don’t see teams using faceoffs as a market inefficiency, to the extent that our models say it exists.”
The Souza record:
15-16 10th place
16-17 10th place
17-18 11th place
18-19 8th place
19-20 9th place
20-21 10th place
21-22 9th place
22-23 10th place
23-24 6th place
Comment
-
Originally posted by NCAA watcher View PostWell, Damn, that goes against my conventional wisdom
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...key-analytics/
Always have believed that FOW are undervalued, along with SOG.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by NCAA watcher View PostWell, Damn, that goes against my conventional wisdom
The result, according to Berkery, shows that general managers could be undervaluing faceoff wins and costing their teams goals, points and jobs. He’s convinced at least one team to listen to a presentation of his research in the coming weeks, which he hopes will mark another advance in how the sport uses certain metrics to analyze success.
Berkery, a native of Herndon, Va., developed his hockey project along with Johns Hopkins students Chase Seibold, Justin Nam and Max Stevens as part of the school’s sports analytics research group. They set out to test the theory that faceoffs, which occur roughly 60 times per game, are undervalued in shaping puck possession between teams and could significantly influence the outcome of games.
“Our kind of rule of thumb is that if you can win six more faceoffs per game, you can add about 15 goals in production for free to your team’s bottom line. Six more faceoffs is kind of like a middle six forward,” Berkery said. “And with that significant impact on the table, we don’t see teams using faceoffs as a market inefficiency, to the extent that our models say it exists.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...key-analytics/
So that's the template the JH nerd squad is referencing in trying to apply this to hockey. Now apply that to hockey, and ask yourself, "Is this a better quality game for spectators - US - if we have hockey FOGO's?"
Hockey and soccer are arguably the two sports least impacted by nerds this generation. It would be nice if we could keep it that way. Baseball has only started to push back (slightly) on some stuff that killed the spectator experience in recent years. Football and hoops no longer bear any resemblance to the games I played as a kid - and no, that's not a good thing. RESIST the nerds and stats geeks as if your game depended on it - because it does. JMHO.Sworn Enemy of the Perpetually Offended
Montreal Expos Forever ...
Comment
-
Comment