*** is up with no cash at concessions? And - didn’t they say concessions were changed and improved? It seeks like it is still the ****ty chicken fingers and not cold enough beer.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BU: '22-'23 Season: Sail The Boats
Collapse
X
-
Well...it could have been worse. I have zero comprehension of how there was anything to impede the goaltender's ability to play the puck on the "winning" goal. Hopefully that extra point won't cost them down the road...it reminded me of the Maine/Denver national championship game at the Garden when a Maine skate was about an inch into the blue paint (and had nothing to do with the goal), causing the goal to be waved off. And why did the referee come out after looking at the replay and consult with the linesman, who didn't even LOOK AT the replay?
Comment
-
Well, they pulled that one out of the air. Lane Hutson is a shifty dude with the puck. Not sure why the winning goal in regulation was waived off. I didn’t see interference on the replay. Tuch’s skate was about 3 inches in the crease. I guess that’s not allowed? Much improved period and it made the difference. I think we get 66% of a win for PWR with the change this year. Better than 0, which was looking likely for much of that game.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BU93 View PostTuch’s skate was about 3 inches in the crease. I guess that’s not allowed? Much improved period and it made the difference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chickod View Post
That was my question. Bernie explained it that it has to interfere with the goalie's ability to "play his position." No way was that the case. The "skate in the blue" thing I believe is a misinterpretation of the intent of the rule. And there was a Lowell player up against the goalie anyway, so there was definitely no contact with a BU player; therefore, it couldn't have been "interference."
Comment
-
Originally posted by ericredaxe View Post*** is up with no cash at concessions? And - didn’t they say concessions were changed and improved? It seeks like it is still the ****ty chicken fingers and not cold enough beer.a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bomber View PostAlso, what the hell was the deal with Lowell having one goalie announced in introductions and then switching?BU Hockey: The trophy case is once again growing
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bomber View PostAlso, what the hell was the deal with Lowell having one goalie announced in introductions and then switching?
Rule 7 - Starting Lineup
7.1 Eligible Players/Player List
Changes in the starting lineup of either team, as given to the referee or official scorer, or in the playing lineup on the ice, shall not be made until
the game is actually in progress unless a penalty changes the on-ice strength or an injury occurs before the first faceoff.
PENALTY—Bench minor if brought to the attention of the referee before the second faceoff in the first period.
By changing the goalie before the game and then after the firUML avoided a penalty.
SeanWomen's Hockey East Champions 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2010
Men's NCAA Champions 2009, 1995, 1978, 1972, 1971
BU Hockey Games
BU Hockey highlights and extras
NCAA Hockey Financials
Women's Division I Longest Hockey Games
I need a kidney; looking for a donor
Comment
-
Ohhhh, I was wondering what all that was at the start of the game.
Phantom goalie interference or not, that goal was a laser shot from Case McCarthy. Why can’t they do that more often?? Many things to be worked on with the two week break.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chickod View PostWell...it could have been worse. I have zero comprehension of how there was anything to impede the goaltender's ability to play the puck on the "winning" goal. Hopefully that extra point won't cost them down the road...it reminded me of the Maine/Denver national championship game at the Garden when a Maine skate was about an inch into the blue paint (and had nothing to do with the goal), causing the goal to be waved off. And why did the referee come out after looking at the replay and consult with the linesman, who didn't even LOOK AT the replay?
NHL certainly has a much higher threshold. I see some in NHL where it looks like clear interference and they let it stand.
Comment
Comment