This game was over in the first period.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Harvard Crimson 2022-2023
Collapse
X
-
Clarkson Men's/Women’s Hockey
ECAC RS: Men: 66, 77, 81, 82, 91, 95, 97, 99, 01, 08 Women: 14, 15, 17, 18
ECAC Tourney: Men: 66, 91, 93, 99, 07,19 Women: 17, 18, 19
NCAA Tourn Appearance: Men: 57, 58, 62, 63, 66, 70, 81, 82, 84, 90, 91, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 07, 08, 18, 19 Women: 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
NCAA Frozen 4 Appearance: Men: 57, 58, 62, 63, 66, 70, 91 Women: 14, 16, 17, 18, 19
NCAA TITLES: Men:Women: 2014
2017
2018
-
Originally posted by bothman View PostAn utterly embarassing, shameful, and disgraceful performance. There is no way around that. It will be interesting to see what Donato has to say. The fact that Harvard could not muster anything between periods should say alot. Defense was tentative and slow (Siedem). First line lost composure and started to try to play hero hockey. Weight room? They were manhandled. Tresca can't win faceoff. I feel bad for Gibson. He deserved better.
I can’t believe how unprepared Harvard was for this game. The coaches deserve a good chunk of the blame. Ohio State came in and knew exactly what to do to attack the Crimson. And Harvard had no answers as you point out. Unacceptable.
Comment
-
What happened to Harvard happened to Michigan much earlier in the season. And it took quite a few games to fully figure out what OSU was doing- we only really beat them two weeks ago in the B1G tournament. Those of the game your team and coaching staff should have watched to see what they would be facing and how to deal with it. I saw a breakdown of it, and even though I played as a kid, it's still hard to figure out the explanation and solution.
Not to tell you to not take it so hard, but OSU has a pretty amazing offensive system that just confounds the D, and makes them turn over the puck. And it does not take more than a handful of goals to really get to their mind.
Comment
-
And it took quite a few games to fully figure out what OSU was doing- we only really beat them two weeks ago in the B1G tournament. Those of the game your team and coaching staff should have watched to see what they would be facing and how to deal with it. I saw a breakdown of it, and even though I played as a kid, it's still hard to figure out the explanation and solution.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bothman View PostAn utterly embarassing, shameful, and disgraceful performance. There is no way around that. It will be interesting to see what Donato has to say. The fact that Harvard could not muster anything between periods should say alot. Defense was tentative and slow (Siedem). First line lost composure and started to try to play hero hockey. Weight room? They were manhandled. Tresca can't win faceoff. I feel bad for Gibson. He deserved better.. . . still crazy after all these years. . .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skate79 View PostWe'll see who stays and who goes. I'm thinking Farrell stays but Coronato might jump ship for Calgary. Laferriere is anyone's guess. I don't see others leaving although with the transfer portal, you never know.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sezenack View Post
Farrell is as good as gone too. I give Coronato a 0% chance of coming back and Farrell maybe a 5% chance. Both players dominated and have nothing left to prove. Both teams like them a lot and will want them signed. Laferriere is a toss up I'd say
Henry Thrun signed a two-year deal with the San Jose Sharks who acquired his rights from Anaheim.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skate79 View Post
I don't agree regarding Farrell and the reason I say that has to do with NESN's College Hockey Journal show on the Crimson. During one segment, Farrell talked about why he came to Harvard, and he mentioned academics was a priority for him and his parents. It's still possible that he leaves but I think it is far less likely than Coronato.
Henry Thrun signed a two-year deal with the San Jose Sharks who acquired his rights from Anaheim.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sezenack View PostI give Coronato a 0% chance of coming back and Farrell maybe a 5% chance. Both players dominated and have nothing left to prove. Both teams like them a lot and will want them signed. Laferriere is a toss up I'd say
Edit: Calgary sure seems to think they are signing Coronato.
Last edited by Kepler; 03-26-2023, 01:39 PM.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
More on the Flames' lust for Coronato.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kepler View Post
Is this just pessimism (optimism?) or had there been earlier signs/rumors they are leaving? I was floored Farrell left. Players just don't leave Harvard early.
Edit: Calgary sure seems to think they are signing Coronato.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kepler View Post
Is this just pessimism (optimism?) or had there been earlier signs/rumors they are leaving? I was floored Farrell left. Players just don't leave Harvard early.
Edit: Calgary sure seems to think they are signing Coronato.a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.
Comment
Comment