If rules should be changed (there are some that should), then change them. But there should be no difference in how a post-season game is called vs. a regular season game, an OT vs. the first period, one conference vs. another.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Official "My Team Got Screwed!" thread of the 2022 NCAA Men's Hockey Tournament
Collapse
X
-
bigmrg74: "You can't drink the day away if you don't start early!"
SledDog: "UncleRay seems to be the most sensible one here tonight."
All great men are dead and I'm not feeling well.
A Margarita! in every hand and another Margarita! in the other hand!
And stay off the lawn!
- 2 likes
-
Originally posted by ticapnews View Post
The Mavericks have a new logo.
"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." Vince Lombardi
"License to kill gophers by the government of the United Nations. Man; free to kill gophers at will. To kill, you must know your enemy, and in this case, my enemy is a varmint....and a varmint will never quit...ever. They're like Viet Cong...Varmint Cong, so you have to fall back on superior intelligence and superior firepower...and that's all she wrote. Au revoir, gopher." Karl Spackler 1980
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by UncleRay View PostIf rules should be changed (there are some that should), then change them. But there should be no difference in how a post-season game is called vs. a regular season game, an OT vs. the first period, one conference vs. another."Through the years, we ever will acclaim........"
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Split-N View Post
Again, respectfully disagree. Hockey, by its nature, is not binary. Just because a certain rule is in the book doesn't automatically mean it has to be called. Referees have wide discretion in determining how a given game is called. If the players are focused on making plays, rather than gooning each other, a good referee will concentrate on calling injury potential infractions and obstruction fouls that cause an unfair change of possession or unfair loss of a scoring opportunity. Infractions that have no bearing on player safety or the course of play IMO should not be called. A moving puck is a referee's, player's and fan's best friend.bigmrg74: "You can't drink the day away if you don't start early!"
SledDog: "UncleRay seems to be the most sensible one here tonight."
All great men are dead and I'm not feeling well.
A Margarita! in every hand and another Margarita! in the other hand!
And stay off the lawn!
Comment
-
Originally posted by UncleRay View Post
Set a scenario where an infraction would have a bearing on player safety or the course of play in one instance but not in another. Just because I can't picture it doesn't mean it doesn't exist."Through the years, we ever will acclaim........"
Comment
-
Originally posted by ticapnews View Post
The Mavericks have a new logo.MTU: Three time NCAA champions.
It never get's easier, you just go faster. -Greg Lemond
Comment
-
Originally posted by Split-N View Post
You're misinterpreting what I said. The injury potential and unfair change of possession/unfair loss of scoring chance infractions should always be called. And you can add to that cheap shots behind the play. It's the ticky tack stuff that doesn't rise to the injury potential/unfairly affect course of play standard that I maintain don't need to be called at this level.bigmrg74: "You can't drink the day away if you don't start early!"
SledDog: "UncleRay seems to be the most sensible one here tonight."
All great men are dead and I'm not feeling well.
A Margarita! in every hand and another Margarita! in the other hand!
And stay off the lawn!
Comment
-
Originally posted by UncleRay View Post
Things that don't need to be called at this level meaning D1? Don't need to be called ever? That sounds like advocating for rule changes, which I would support."Through the years, we ever will acclaim........"
Comment
Comment