Originally posted by jericho
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RPI 2021-22: Picking Up Where We Left Off
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by engineerhockeyfan View Post
It looks like the ECAC is controlling the streaming of the games. And they only show ESPN+ as a place to watch the games.
I don't know about WRPI. Maybe Jericho can tell us more about that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DrDemento View PostWill there be any broadcasting of our series with Dartmouth? WRPI or RPI TV? A shame if we cannot get this kind of exposure for our first round of the playoffs.
I don't know about WRPI. Maybe Jericho can tell us more about that.
Leave a comment:
-
Final. Harvard 3 Princeton 0.
Union will host Princeton while Brown travels to St. Lawrence.
Leave a comment:
-
Will there be any broadcasting of our series with Dartmouth? WRPI or RPI TV? A shame if we cannot get this kind of exposure for our first round of the playoffs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RPI fan 4 life View Post
So here is the potential playoff matchups.
Of course RPI-Dartmouth and Colgate-Yale are set.
if Princeton loses in any fashion, they will play Union regardless of in regulation, OT, or shootout.
If Princeton wins in OT or by shootout, they will finish 9th since they have the tie breaker over Brown and will play at SLU.
if Princeton beats Harvard in regulation, they will tie for 8th with SLU and would have to go to the second tie breaker since they split their season series, each winning in regulation time. And I’m too lazy to go through the second tie breaker. If anyone wants to do that, I’ll take your word for it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DrDemento View PostUnion and SLU still waiting on the Harvard Princeton game to figure out who plays who. I don't think it makes much difference for them as either can play the spoiler role as Princeton did for us up in Lake Placid in 1995!
Of course RPI-Dartmouth and Colgate-Yale are set.
if Princeton loses in any fashion, they will play Union regardless of in regulation, OT, or shootout.
If Princeton wins in OT or by shootout, they will finish 9th since they have the tie breaker over Brown and will play at SLU.
if Princeton beats Harvard in regulation, they will tie for 8th with SLU and would have to go to the second tie breaker since they split their season series, each winning in regulation time. And I’m too lazy to go through the second tie breaker. If anyone wants to do that, I’ll take your word for it.
Leave a comment:
-
Union and SLU still waiting on the Harvard Princeton game to figure out who plays who. I don't think it makes much difference for them as either can play the spoiler role as Princeton did for us up in Lake Placid in 1995!
Leave a comment:
-
Forget what I just said, We play Dartmouth next week.http://www.playoffstatus.com/ecachoc...fschedule.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RPI fan 4 life View PostYou are correct, Waite21. According to ecachockey.com, the first tie breaker is total points earned in head-to-head matchups. Since Dartmouth’s win came in regulation and Yale’s in OT, Dartmouth earned 4 points to Yale’s 2.
So Dartmouth comes to HFH next weekend, while Yale goes to Colgate.
I don't know what that means either. Just sayin'
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rpi82 View PostI just got around to watching the final moments of the game and the senior ceremony. I can't say I was surprised by anyone other than Helsen (until they introduced his wife and I realized that he may have very good reasons for wanting to get on with his life) but I had been cautiously hoping one or more of the guys that are eligible for the Covid bonus year might take advantage of it. Unless we have some undisclosed commits, we are desperately in need of a few more defensemen (at most 5 returning and only 1 known commit since McDonald is this year's winner of the Huxley Memorial Forever the Enemy award). Smith will undoubtedly be spying the transfer portal for at least one of them. Up front we have some interesting prospects coming in but no big goal scorers to replace 6 guys that scored 51% of our goals (57% if you add the graduating defensemen). Hopefully one or more of the depth guys Smith has been cultivating will break out Linden-style or we are going to struggle even more to score. Fortunately, I think we have our goalie for the next few years so, while we need to add another goalie, we won't need to depend on him for much more than intermittent duty.
Edit: And hopefully Shirley doesn't return. :-DLast edited by Ralph Baer; 02-27-2022, 05:28 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
I just got around to watching the final moments of the game and the senior ceremony. I can't say I was surprised by anyone other than Helsen (until they introduced his wife and I realized that he may have very good reasons for wanting to get on with his life) but I had been cautiously hoping one or more of the guys that are eligible for the Covid bonus year might take advantage of it. Unless we have some undisclosed commits, we are desperately in need of a few more defensemen (at most 5 returning and only 1 known commit since McDonald is this year's winner of the Huxley Memorial Forever the Enemy award). Smith will undoubtedly be spying the transfer portal for at least one of them. Up front we have some interesting prospects coming in but no big goal scorers to replace 6 guys that scored 51% of our goals (57% if you add the graduating defensemen). Hopefully one or more of the depth guys Smith has been cultivating will break out Linden-style or we are going to struggle even more to score. Fortunately, I think we have our goalie for the next few years so, while we need to add another goalie, we won't need to depend on him for much more than intermittent duty.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RPI fan 4 life View PostYou are correct, Waite21. According to ecachockey.com, the first tie breaker is total points earned in head-to-head matchups. Since Dartmouth’s win came in regulation and Yale’s in OT, Dartmouth earned 4 points to Yale’s 2.
So Dartmouth comes to HFH next weekend, while Yale goes to Colgate.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: