Chuck & Norbert -
Any discussion of this topic has to be viewed through a lens of reality - and the fact of the matter is that in the current environment no fans in the stands is simply the cost of having a season at all. You won't be in the building whether games are played or canceled, so I'd appreciate the fact they're trying to play. No fans is the protocol at every college hockey arena in the country (at least for now). Debating the semantics under which you would feel safe, or believe fans could be allowed in the building, is pointless. Targeting UNH for a decision that has been made across the country even more so...
Who cares what led to more HE games on NESN - I'm just thankful that they've seen an opportunity and taken advantage of it. They didn't have to increase the number of televised games, just like they didn't have to offer a free stream of the remaining contests. Maybe they shouldn't be offering a free stream ($$) - but the decision is obviously not based entirely on revenue. It's actually a pretty solid gesture, streaming the games free of charge for fans upset about not being able to attend. There will be a lot of empty basketball arena's soon, with games played by conferences/schools/tournaments eagerly charging fans to watch the games online...
The cardboard cutouts are NOT expected to generate revenue to fund the athletic department. The hope is they (along with other marketing and fundraising initiatives) can generate ENOUGH revenue to allow the department to survive the downturn without harming any major stakeholders. I would be willing to bet there are AT LEAST ten employees in the UNH athletic department making 35,000/Year or less (Chuck's example of a fully cardboard Whitt could cover those salaries for a year). If the cutout revenue only covers those salaries for the next few months and prevents the firing or furloughing of those employees (who are already underpaid and living paycheck to paycheck) is it a gimmick you can live with? Perhaps the revenue generated from the cutouts and other initiatives will allow UNH to avoid slashing scholarship budgets across multiple sports? If a student-athlete can keep their scholarship - and UNH doesn't fall (further) behind the competition - is that worth the gimmick? Or is it all still just follow the leader? You don't have to like the idea, but maybe, just maybe, it isn't about either of you...
You want to get back in the building? There is one way to make that happen - and it isn't defiance or denial...
Any discussion of this topic has to be viewed through a lens of reality - and the fact of the matter is that in the current environment no fans in the stands is simply the cost of having a season at all. You won't be in the building whether games are played or canceled, so I'd appreciate the fact they're trying to play. No fans is the protocol at every college hockey arena in the country (at least for now). Debating the semantics under which you would feel safe, or believe fans could be allowed in the building, is pointless. Targeting UNH for a decision that has been made across the country even more so...
Who cares what led to more HE games on NESN - I'm just thankful that they've seen an opportunity and taken advantage of it. They didn't have to increase the number of televised games, just like they didn't have to offer a free stream of the remaining contests. Maybe they shouldn't be offering a free stream ($$) - but the decision is obviously not based entirely on revenue. It's actually a pretty solid gesture, streaming the games free of charge for fans upset about not being able to attend. There will be a lot of empty basketball arena's soon, with games played by conferences/schools/tournaments eagerly charging fans to watch the games online...
The cardboard cutouts are NOT expected to generate revenue to fund the athletic department. The hope is they (along with other marketing and fundraising initiatives) can generate ENOUGH revenue to allow the department to survive the downturn without harming any major stakeholders. I would be willing to bet there are AT LEAST ten employees in the UNH athletic department making 35,000/Year or less (Chuck's example of a fully cardboard Whitt could cover those salaries for a year). If the cutout revenue only covers those salaries for the next few months and prevents the firing or furloughing of those employees (who are already underpaid and living paycheck to paycheck) is it a gimmick you can live with? Perhaps the revenue generated from the cutouts and other initiatives will allow UNH to avoid slashing scholarship budgets across multiple sports? If a student-athlete can keep their scholarship - and UNH doesn't fall (further) behind the competition - is that worth the gimmick? Or is it all still just follow the leader? You don't have to like the idea, but maybe, just maybe, it isn't about either of you...
You want to get back in the building? There is one way to make that happen - and it isn't defiance or denial...
Comment