Originally posted by J.D.
View Post
In Minnesota the health department has traced 280 some infections directly to sports activity. Meaning, the athlete was infected while in/at the facility they were playing. AND...the MDH is saying that since 40% are asymptomatic, their current count is vastly (their word, not mine) undercounted. And yes, IF we were really doing this the "right way", there wouldn't be any sports until we had a vaccine. Would my opinion change on that if we knew we wouldn't have a vaccine for at least another year or two? It probably would because then the "risk/benefit analysis" would change considerably in regards to the negative effects on both kids and society as a whole. But to "sacrifice" for one calendar year isn't that much to ask for us as a society. I respect your right to disagree. However, as a certain VP said recently in a debate, although you (and Chuck and Jeb and others) are entitled to your own opinion, you aren't entitled to your own facts.
Comment