Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

    If the predictions hold up, I feel like UMD may have the easiest bracket of the one-seeds. PSU not being in Allentown makes their path to Buffalo pretty clean.
    Go Pioneers!

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

      blaa blaa blaa ECAC gets FOUR IN....All I'm saying !
      It all starts with the goaltending.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

        What channel??

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Scarlet View Post
          What channel??
          Supposed to be on ESPN U. Not working on my cable right now.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

            Chalk bracket...nice.
            Feel bad for Kato though
            "If you leave ignorance and stupidity alone, ignorance and stupidity will think it's ok."
            -Gallagher

            R.I.P.
            Grandpa G. ~ Feb 11, 1918-Oct. 6, 1999
            Grandma ~ Jan 2004
            Dad ~ Nov. 4, 1958-April 21, 2008
            Grandpa S. ~ June 21, 1932-November 11, 2013

            SCSU 2015-16 scoring by class through 40 games
            Seniors: 210 points (71G, 139A) from 5 players
            Juniors: 39 points (8G, 31A) from 4 players
            Sophomores: 99 points (49G, 50A) from 5 players
            Freshmen: 129 points (43G, 86A) from 8 players

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

              No Melrose.
              YALE HOCKEY
              2013 National Champions

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by First Time, Long Time View Post
                Chalk bracket...nice.
                Feel bad for Kato though
                Committee had options. Chose to ignore those. But now it’s done. Let’s go get ‘em!

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by First Time, Long Time View Post
                  Chalk bracket...nice.
                  Feel bad for Kato though
                  If they lose again, hoo-boy.
                  the state of hockey is good

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by state of hockey View Post
                    If they lose again, hoo-boy.
                    I don’t think I can handle it...
                    AF 99

                    M-A-V-E-R-I-C-K-S, MAVERICKS, MAVERICKS, GOOOOO STATE!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

                      Originally posted by purpleinnebraska View Post
                      Committee had options. Chose to ignore those. But now it’s done. Let’s go get ‘em!
                      The bracket was made with complete seeding integrity intact. I can't wait to hear the rationalization that they should have sacrificed bracket integrity so a #1 seed could duck a #4 seed.
                      Lowell Forever
                      Forever Lowell

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Patronick View Post
                        The bracket was made with complete seeding integrity intact. I can't wait to hear the rationalization that they should have sacrificed bracket integrity so a #1 seed could duck a #4 seed.
                        No one has argued that, just where one of the 1 seeds is playing the 4 seed.
                        the state of hockey is good

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

                          Originally posted by John J. MacInnes View Post
                          Here's an interesting note. Since WMU has been essentially eliminated, that means that there will be no teams from the state of Michigan in the field of 16. This will only be the second time that has occurred since 1979, two years before the field was increased to 8 teams. The only other time this happened in that span was the 2013 tournament.
                          There was something about the blue bloods (WI/MI/MN/BC/BU/UND) all missing the tourney in the same year. I think it was the 60s the last time that happened.....
                          Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
                          Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by The Rube View Post
                            There was something about the blue bloods (WI/MI/MN/BC/BU/UND) all missing the tourney in the same year. I think it was the 60s the last time that happened.....
                            If you add Tech to that list it covers all prior tournaments.
                            North Dakota
                            National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

                              Originally posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View Post
                              If you add Tech to that list it covers all prior tournaments.
                              That's just sick.
                              Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
                              Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: 2019 NCAA Tournament Bracketology

                                Originally posted by Patronick View Post
                                The bracket was made with complete seeding integrity intact. I can't wait to hear the rationalization that they should have sacrificed bracket integrity so a #1 seed could duck a #4 seed.
                                got it?
                                a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X