Originally posted by FlagDUDE08
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Collapse
X
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Originally posted by joecct View PostShall we turn off the internet?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Originally posted by MarkEagleUSA View PostEvery game I was at last season did at least 3 breaks per period... 5/10/15
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by alfablue View PostIt wasn't about the two teams on the ice, it was how the game was different with no TV. For instance, a team that isn't as deep has an advantage for TV games, when the non games they had to deal with the players they had. Those 3 min of known stops per period make a big difference WRT rest. Now all the games are the same, regardless.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Originally posted by Pirateasaur View PostI recall that but I never truly bought it since both teams on the ice are playing by the same rule in that game. Teams already play on different rink sizes with which I also have no issue.
But if the stoppages truly bring revenue into smaller market teams then I am more willing to tolerate them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by alfablue View PostThe TV timeouts exist for all games to make all games the same. The rule was put in place well before streaming was like it is- and it was because games that had TV coverage had timeouts, and others didn't. Which does make the games very different. Some conferences had a lot of TV games, some had almost none- so the rule was to make all the games the same.
Now it works out to allow advertising.
But if the stoppages truly bring revenue into smaller market teams then I am more willing to tolerate them.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View PostECAC doesn't, with exception to now the 10 minute rule to shovel (they don't do 3 breaks in a period unless it is televised).
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Originally posted by alfablue View PostThe TV timeouts exist for all games to make all games the same. The rule was put in place well before streaming was like it is- and it was because games that had TV coverage had timeouts, and others didn't. Which does make the games very different. Some conferences had a lot of TV games, some had almost none- so the rule was to make all the games the same.
Now it works out to allow advertising.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Originally posted by LTsatch View PostWent back two pages and didn’t notice the any other.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View PostA quick google search didn’t show the change to the slashing definition. Anyone have any insight on this?
But that's me, not our overlords.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
A quick google search didn’t show the change to the slashing definition. Anyone have any insight on this?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
Originally posted by Sean Pickett View PostWhile most games are not on TV most are streamed lived. Those timeouts allow commercials to help pay for the streaming. Last season I watched BU games (men's and women's) played at Maine, Northeastern, BC, UNH and other schools that stream for free and if the timeouts help pay for the streaming I have no problem sitting through them when I am at BU games.
Sean
Now it works out to allow advertising.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Proposed rule changes, OT format, top of the list
In your defense, it does have a deceiving title...
Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: