Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Well, figured out a costly way but easy way to skip all these parking situation problems.
Just got a room at the Radisson. That will at least make things a lot easier for Saturday morning.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by Middle Street View PostWith all of this parking/traffic hassle, maybe we would have been better off going to Fargo?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
I assume Manchester will also be holding concurrent Memorial Day and Independence Day parades?
Maybe a car show as well?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Besides only a few would even be able to get tickets...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
With all of this parking/traffic hassle, maybe we would have been better off going to Fargo?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by BostonSoccerDad View PostRe: parking on Saturday - not sure if this is a good idea or not, but I am thinking of parking near the Skyzone. Seems to be just far enough away from the 1/2 marathon route and the arena (~1 mile walk). This would avoid having to deal with the Rte 293 exit ramps which can be hideous.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Re: parking on Saturday - not sure if this is a good idea or not, but I am thinking of parking near the Skyzone. Seems to be just far enough away from the 1/2 marathon route and the arena (~1 mile walk). This would avoid having to deal with the Rte 293 exit ramps which can be hideous.
Leave a comment:
-
Would be great to be a student again. UML student deal for Manchester regional is $40 and includes a ticket and round trip bus for both days. Good for Lowell!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Serious thanks to all those that have told us a bit about Cornell. Having seen them once (ever), it's really appreciated.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Cornell isn't even at full strength on defense. Three of their regular defenders are out (one of whom hasn't played a single game this year and another thanks to a certain Union player ).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BIG Green View PostRe: Dartmouth Hockey 2016-17 Season
Quote Originally Posted by Middle Street View Post
BIG Green, having seen both UML and Cornell this season, do you have any thoughts on that match up for this coming weekend?
FYI, and Good Luck!
UML and Harvard were the two most offensively explosiveness teams we have seen. I believe Harvard has more overall depth top to bottom. The PP on these teams were lethal. UML works for the one-timer on the weakside, mostly off the right hand circle with a leftie shot. The finishes on thse one-timers were of NHL-caliber, bar-down and hard, our goalie had no chance. I do remember that UML was predominantly lefties and CJ Smith and Gambardella were outstanding. You guys can get up and down with speed and skill. Whereas Cornell has a really BIG team, kind of lumbering so they like to play down low on O and win board battles and scrums in front of the net. So we have two different styles of play...whichever team imposes their style will win. If I were a betting man and I picked Cornell losing to Harvard in the ECAC final, I would say UML takes this one 4-2, too much fire power, the same kind that Harvard gave Cornell fits to.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Re: Dartmouth Hockey 2016-17 Season
Quote Originally Posted by Middle Street View Post
BIG Green, having seen both UML and Cornell this season, do you have any thoughts on that match up for this coming weekend?
FYI, and Good Luck!
UML and Harvard were the two most offensively explosiveness teams we have seen. I believe Harvard has more overall depth top to bottom. The PP on these teams were lethal. UML works for the one-timer on the weakside, mostly off the right hand circle with a leftie shot. The finishes on thse one-timers were of NHL-caliber, bar-down and hard, our goalie had no chance. I do remember that UML was predominantly lefties and CJ Smith and Gambardella were outstanding. You guys can get up and down with speed and skill. Whereas Cornell has a really BIG team, kind of lumbering so they like to play down low on O and win board battles and scrums in front of the net. So we have two different styles of play...whichever team imposes their style will win. If I were a betting man and I picked Cornell losing to Harvard in the ECAC final, I would say UML takes this one 4-2, too much fire power, the same kind that Harvard gave Cornell fits to.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: