Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • leswp1
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Happy Birthday bottomdweller!

    Leave a comment:


  • Patman
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by leswp1 View Post
    This post looks like something my kid would have said when he was little. Once you win you gloat in silence. It is much more powerful than thumbing your nose at people. There were plenty of people that posted the type of thing you quoted. You didn't need to respond to the few that didn't. Now I will take off my Mommy hat and say good night.
    that's not true, he'd never say that, you buy soap by the pallet

    Leave a comment:


  • leswp1
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by WeAreNDHockey View Post
    Yeah nothing at all like a few UML posters who said Notre Dame shouldn't even show up in Manchester because UML owned us and we were nothing but a punk program because UML had our number in some regular season games or conference playoff semi final games. What goes around comes around. Find a post of mine in a Michigan thread after the NCAA game last year and read what I said to their fans. Never mind, I'll find it for you:



    Then go find some posts of mine on another fan forum (and maybe this one too) and see how I repeatedly praise UML's program and coach. I've even sung the praises of his former assistants because I know they learned the right way to run a program from Bazin.
    This post looks like something my kid would have said when he was little. Once you win you gloat in silence. It is much more powerful than thumbing your nose at people. There were plenty of people that posted the type of thing you quoted. You didn't need to respond to the few that didn't. Now I will take off my Mommy hat and say good night.

    Leave a comment:


  • WeAreNDHockey
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Yeah nothing at all like a few UML posters who said Notre Dame shouldn't even show up in Manchester because UML owned us and we were nothing but a punk program because UML had our number in some regular season games or conference playoff semi final games. What goes around comes around. Find a post of mine in a Michigan thread after the NCAA game last year and read what I said to their fans. Never mind, I'll find it for you:

    Originally posted by WeAreNDHockey View Post
    That was the right kind of hockey game last night. 2 teams just playing hockey until one found a way to score one more goal than the other. Congrats on the win.
    Then go find some posts of mine on another fan forum (and maybe this one too) and see how I repeatedly praise UML's program and coach. I've even sung the praises of his former assistants because I know they learned the right way to run a program from Bazin.

    Leave a comment:


  • leswp1
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Still kind of in sad shock but when I think back to a time when we were watching losing seasons, I couldn't give tix away and there were no fans that traveled. Now- we had a sea of blue in the Gahden and in Manchvegas. We made it there and even had commentators saying our team is the full package and going on for paragraphs rather than a soundbite. It stinks that the only way to be satisfied it to end up winning it all.

    Also stinks to read snarkey commentary from the other team after such a close game. Those who win with class are those who are respected.... ah well

    Leave a comment:


  • UMLFan
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by ScottK View Post
    I keep seeing this stat, but it's not exactly true. They are 7-0 in the 1st game of the regionals (1994, 1996, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016, 2017). In 1988, there were no "regionals", but a 1st round was played and Lowell lost a 2-game total-goals series to Wisconsin, losing the 1st game, and tying the 2nd.

    Monty- you need to update your sig.
    Thanks Scott.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScottK
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by UMLFan View Post
    7-0 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. I bet there's no one that's got a better record than that.
    1-6 in the second. So there's that.
    I keep seeing this stat, but it's not exactly true. They are 7-0 in the 1st game of the regionals (1994, 1996, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016, 2017). In 1988, there were no "regionals", but a 1st round was played and Lowell lost a 2-game total-goals series to Wisconsin, losing the 1st game, and tying the 2nd.

    Monty- you need to update your sig.

    Leave a comment:


  • umlhockey22490
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by UMLFan View Post
    7-0 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. I bet there's no one that's got a better record than that.
    1-6 in the second. So there's that.
    That hurts....just a bit

    Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • UMLFan
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    7-0 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. I bet there's no one that's got a better record than that.
    1-6 in the second. So there's that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patman
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    just looked at that zink replay and still can't understand how that happened exactly other than they got wrapped up into each other... ugh... unless I can "zapruder" it I'll just have to chalk it up to terrible luck

    Leave a comment:


  • walrus
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by boblav1 View Post
    Agree. I thought Lowell had several chances early in the game to score but couldn't covert. Peterson was giving up some big rebounds early that were just out of reach. They also had three power plays that they didn't take advantage of. A tough way for the game to end but I like the fact that the refs let the teams play.
    I thought it could have been 4-2 Lowell after 1. They flat out missed good opportunities in the 1st. Good game to watch from a fan of neither team

    Leave a comment:


  • boblav1
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by brassbonanza View Post
    Chick's right though, if you're putting yourself in a situation, like BU did on Saturday, where you're one call/no call away from losing a game, you've already missed opportunities elsewhere.
    Agree. I thought Lowell had several chances early in the game to score but couldn't convert. Peterson was giving up some big rebounds early that were just out of reach. They also had three power plays that they didn't take advantage of. A tough way for the game to end but I like the fact that the refs let the teams play.
    Last edited by boblav1; 03-27-2017, 12:36 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • boblav1
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by Middle Street View Post
    I'm encouraged by what I see from Lohin, I'm thinking he could be the next guy.
    The same with Nick Master. Although he didn't show up in the scoring sheet he was huge on faceoffs this weekend winning 30 of 42 in the two game.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.D.
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    I watched that play 10 times. I don't see anything warranting just a penalty on ND. either matching or nothing. ND player had stick slashed out of his hands in 3rd leading to good chance for lowell. Didn't have a problem with nothing being called on that cluster in OT. they looked like they were dancing together.

    Leave a comment:


  • leswp1
    replied
    Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2

    Originally posted by Nick Papagiorgio View Post
    No.
    see edit.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X