Originally posted by J.D.
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by J.D. View Post...but there's something about these conference rematches a week later...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Lowell should win easily today but there's something about these conference rematches a week later...
I will be there and would like ND to actually put up a "fight" for once.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by theprofromdover View PostSort of like the elbow the Lowell player laid out Matt Gaudreau with that went uncalled?
Should have been called but wasn't. Grow up.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by riverchief1 View PostBut you're very tolerant.
Originally posted by theprofromdover View PostSort of like the elbow the Lowell player laid out Matt Gaudreau with that went uncalled?Last edited by leswp1; 03-26-2017, 07:01 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by leswp1 View Post...elbows to the head seemed to be a specialty......
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Boston Globe game recap
Boston Herald game recap
Cornell Daily Sun game recap
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by mookie1995 View Posttough to keep beating the same team. mookie wishes you guys had the goofs tomorrow. really hope y'all win.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by boblav1 View PostInterference: Blindside hits. (Rule 59.1) A category of penalty in the interference rule will be added to separate a severe blindside hit from the contact to the head penalty. In these cases, a major penalty may be called for blindside contact when the head is not contacted.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by Red Hockey View PostI don't pay enough attention to the HE, but is there a team similar to Cornell (bigger, less speedy players with an emphasis on defense and trapping) in terms of playstyle? Probably not but I'm curious.
Also, I always find it strange that so many people consider Cornell a "dirty" team when there are actual dirty teams in the conference (like say Dartmouth). Neverending reputation I guess.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by riverchief1 View PostAnd it was a 5 minute major for interference? Crazy.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by leswp1 View PostI never heard of that before. I thought it was a charge but after 35 + yrs I guess I am still learning
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by riverchief1 View PostWait until tomorrow, there will be even more there. Don't forget parade that goes until 2pm and pregame starts at 1:30 so allow time and alternate routes to find parking. We know how much you love Manchester's traffic management during events.
Yes, Cornell was quite the bunch of dirtbags. Agreed that there were some just head-scratching moments when you couldn't understand why penalties weren't being called. Lots of extracurriculars taking place on the part of Cornell, often right in front of the refs. They finally had to call something after that hit to CJ with around 6 left in the third, totally uncalled for. And it was a 5 minute major for interference? Crazy.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 2016/2017 Lowell Thread: Hoping for Chicago pt 2
Originally posted by leswp1 View PostLottsa Blue there today.
What we saw was not clean play. cheap stabs after play, elbows to the head seemed to be a specialty in the corners. There were a few I really don't understand how the ref didn't call them. I get the intensity and the let them play thing but there were at least 2 really nasty hits from behind right in front of us. Our guy was facing us and the Cornel guy slammed him from behind complete with the head snap into the glass. Not OK. Wouldn't be OK if our guy did it either.
Watched just a little of the Goofs and the ugly gold hats. Both sides seemed like they were big, slow and no flow. Left before it got interesting. Got back in time to see the goal that wrecked the OT game I wanted to see.
Yes, Cornell was quite the bunch of dirtbags. Agreed that there were some just head-scratching moments when you couldn't understand why penalties weren't being called. Lots of extracurriculars taking place on the part of Cornell, often right in front of the refs. They finally had to call something after that hit to CJ with around 6 left in the third, totally uncalled for. And it was a 5 minute major for interference? Crazy.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: