Originally posted by gfan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
Collapse
X
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
Originally posted by J.D. View PostIf you're saying because of this it shouldn't have counted, we're on the same page*****
Comment
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
I have the greatest respect for the Lowell hockey program, but that goal should not have counted. Hockey East - you should be ashamed. Your on-ice referees got the call correct. Too bad you are more interested in kowtowing to Jerry York and keeping on schedule than having this epic game decided correctly on a valid goal.Last edited by uncle_cliff; 03-18-2016, 08:52 PM.
Comment
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
Originally posted by J.D. View PostIf you're saying because of this it shouldn't have counted, we're on the same page
Comment
-
Originally posted by sterlippo1 View Postme too, not even close but karma kinda. Makes up for the screw job they got vs BU
Comment
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
Can't see how the call on the ice is overturned. If it's called a goal on the ice, the same logic would apply. He didn't "kick" it, but he certainly pushed it. Wouldn't be surprised if the officials' own fatigue pushed their decision here.¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Comment
-
Originally posted by uncle_cliff View PostI have the greatest respect for the Lowell hockey program, but that goal should not have counted. Hockey East - you should be ashamed. Your on-ice referees got the call correct. Too bad you are more interested in kow towing to Jerry York and keeping on schedule than having this epic game decided correctly on a valid goal.
Comment
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
OK, folks here we go again
From the NCAA Rule Book
83.4 Goals Scored Off of Skates -
A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official. A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal.
...
A goal shall be allowed if a puck deflects off an attacking player who is in the act of stopping.
The key is the last sentence. There is no question in my mind that the skate was turned towards the net, however, the catch is that the skate was not lifted or moved vertically. Don't blame the refs on this one. College hockey resisted this change in rules for a long time. Even a few years ago, this goal would not have counted and I think that's why the refs waived it off.
While the hockey purest in me can't stand goals off skates, it's the way the game has changed towards in the past 10-15 years. While my team came out on top, I just hate to see overtime games decided like that, especially an epic game like this.- John
2013, 2014, 2017: UML Hockey: Hockey East Champions!
Comment
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
Originally posted by uncle_cliff View PostToo bad you are more interested in kowtowing to Jerry York and keeping on schedule than having this epic game decided correctly on a valid goal.*****
Comment
-
Originally posted by uncle_cliff View PostI have the greatest respect for the Lowell hockey program, but that goal should not have counted. Hockey East - you should be ashamed. Your on-ice referees got the call correct. Too bad you are more interested in kowtowing to Jerry York and keeping on schedule than having this epic game decided correctly on a valid goal.BS UML '04, PhD UConn '09
Jerseys I would like to have:
Skating Friar Jersey
AIC Yellowjacket Jersey w/ Yellowjacket logo on front
UAF Jersey w/ Polar Bear on Front
Army Black Knight logo jersey
NCAA Men's Division 1 Simulation Primer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scarlet View PostWhat screw job would that be? Do you mean the HE Championship game in 2009 when they thought they scored but was called no goal early in the second period and when they had more than half the game left to actually try to tie it, not to mention several power play opportunities to give them a bit more of an advantage over BU who only scored one goal? That screw job?BS UML '04, PhD UConn '09
Jerseys I would like to have:
Skating Friar Jersey
AIC Yellowjacket Jersey w/ Yellowjacket logo on front
UAF Jersey w/ Polar Bear on Front
Army Black Knight logo jersey
NCAA Men's Division 1 Simulation Primer
Comment
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
Don't change a thing....this is a treat every time it happens like this.
Originally posted by Khryx View PostAs an impartial observer, I have to ask. Do you prefer the current overtime format or would you like to see a change such as 4 on 4 or 3 on 3? Perhaps just regular season, perhaps post season as well.
Also congrats to both teams, an outstanding defensive effort by both.- John
2013, 2014, 2017: UML Hockey: Hockey East Champions!
Comment
-
Re: Lowell/Providence Hockey East Semi Final (3/18) – Alliance Suspended!
Originally posted by John_Fuller View PostOK, folks here we go again
From the NCAA Rule Book
83.4 Goals Scored Off of Skates -
A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official. A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player’s skate
who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal.
...
A goal shall be allowed if a puck deflects off an attacking player who is in the act of stopping.
The key is the last sentence. There is no question in my mind that the skate was turned towards the net, however, the catch is that the skate was not lifted or moved vertically. Don't blame the refs on this one. College hockey resisted this change in rules for a long time. Even a few years ago, this goal would not have counted and I think that's why the refs waived it off.
While the hockey purest in me can't stand goals off skates, it's the way the game has changed towards in the past 10-15 years. While my team came out on top, I just hate to see overtime games decided like that, especially an epic game like this.*****
Comment
Comment