Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pairwise -- post jan 8th

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mookie1995
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by kdiff77 View Post
    I'm a Brown fan, not a PC fan. We haven't made the tournament in 22 years, and I'm fairly sure the PWR wasn't a factor in 1994.
    ah sorry.... i've seen your name in the pc threads now and again when i stop by.


    y'all have a better rink than pc. i'll give you that

    Leave a comment:


  • kdiff77
    replied
    Originally posted by mookie1995 View Post
    lucky you. any other system and pc wouldn't have had those 2 home games to win and get to boston. y'all would have been awaiting a phone call from the NIT
    I'm a Brown fan, not a PC fan. We haven't made the tournament in 22 years, and I'm fairly sure the PWR wasn't a factor in 1994.

    Leave a comment:


  • LTsatch
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Yale love Pairwise. Pairwise good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirty
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by UMICH View Post
    Then like always you'd be wrong...
    Oh yeah?

    Leave a comment:


  • UMICH
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by Dirty View Post
    Sure I can.
    Then like always you'd be wrong...

    Leave a comment:


  • ticapnews
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    A trolling expedition with both Dirty and mookie. Better make sure the bait buckets are full!

    Leave a comment:


  • UML Puck Hawk
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by mookie1995 View Post
    lucky you. any other system and pc wouldn't have had those 2 home games to win and get to boston. y'all would have been awaiting a phone call from the NIT
    and for depriving the skating eichels a national championship the rest of the country was also grateful to that system for a few weeks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirty
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by UMICH View Post
    You cannot deny that it is light-years ahead of the now defunct BCS....
    Sure I can.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tater
    replied
    Originally posted by Dirty View Post
    So we once again have proof of what a poor ranking system the PWR is.
    Especially after it sent 6 NCHC teams in last year.

    Though they did make great fodder for Hockey East teams!

    Leave a comment:


  • mookie1995
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by kdiff77 View Post
    I'll second this, but I'll also say that Quinnipiac and Harvard are very legitimate title contenders and deserving of their top-5 rankings. Cornell, on the other hand, just has a good goaltender and very poor possession stats, so I would imagine they'll be exposed before long.
    lucky you. any other system and pc wouldn't have had those 2 home games to win and get to boston. y'all would have been awaiting a phone call from the NIT

    Leave a comment:


  • UMICH
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by Dirty View Post
    No, I think I'll stick with my original viewpoint. PWR is obviously a terribly flawed system.
    You cannot deny that it is light-years ahead of the now defunct BCS....

    Leave a comment:


  • kdiff77
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by Dirty View Post
    PWR is obviously a terribly flawed system.
    I'll second this, but I'll also say that Quinnipiac and Harvard are very legitimate title contenders and deserving of their top-5 rankings. Cornell, on the other hand, just has a good goaltender and very poor possession stats, so I would imagine they'll be exposed before long.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirty
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by mookie1995 View Post
    or a rather strong system.
    No, I think I'll stick with my original viewpoint. PWR is obviously a terribly flawed system.

    Leave a comment:


  • mookie1995
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by Dirty View Post
    So we once again have proof of what a poor ranking system the PWR is.
    or a rather strong system.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirty
    replied
    Re: pairwise -- post jan 8th

    Originally posted by sshablak View Post
    EZAZ has the #1,#4 and #5 ranked pairwise teams.
    So we once again have proof of what a poor ranking system the PWR is.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X