Originally posted by Steve_MN
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by Numbers View PostThanks, blue. Also, my thought is that there is no penalty for losing. So,a schedule weighted with lots of strong opponents has no downside.If you want to be a BADGER, just come along with me
BRING BACK PAT RICHTER!!!
At his graduation ceremony from the U of Minnesota, my cousin got a keychain. When asked what UW gave her for graduation, my sister said, "A degree from a University that matters."
Canned music is a pathetic waste of your time.
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by Numbers View PostNice. I do think, however, that given the choice, the committee would put either Michigan or Notre Dame in Cincinnati. Other wise, too much potential for an almost empty arena. Do you think otherwise, and if so, why?
More likely is the committee accepts that Cincinnati will be empty regardless, and do as much as possible to help the other three regions.Originally posted by dicaslover
Yep, you got it. I heart Maize.
Originally posted by Kristin
Maybe I'm missing something but you just asked me which MSU I go to and then you knew the theme of my homecoming, how do you know one and not the other?
Western College Hockey Blog
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by Numbers View PostThis is debatable. The currently accepted way to do the calculation means that your opponents contribution to you're RPI in each game is weighted according to home/away won/loss. Thus, losing at home to to a strong team is preferable to losing urge road to a weak team.Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so many memories. - Stephen Wright
Comment
-
As far as I understand, wins losses are weighted 0.8/1.2. Meaning for your own win percentage, a road win or home loss counts 1.2.
There was a big discussion about the SOS part, which seemed to be solved recently, that the SOS party is also weighted. But I am not sure the details of that. It may be as simple as...
If the game is at home, SOS counts 0.8. On the road, 1.2.
Or, it gets weighted according to whether you Erin ours list as well.
Where is Jim Dahl?Last edited by Numbers; 02-24-2014, 09:39 PM.
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by MaizeRage View PostNotre Dame didn't help attendance at all in Toledo, and North Dakota didn't help attendance at all in Grand Rapids last year. Neither would do much for Cincinnati. I suspect Michigan wouldn't help much either, if they even made the tournament, which...
More likely is the committee accepts that Cincinnati will be empty regardless, and do as much as possible to help the other three regions.
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by cole_cutz View PostDoesn't matter with Notre Dame they won't come close to making it. They won't get a point at BC this weekend which will probably leave them in 8th place in HE hosting and probably beating UMass for a game then on the road for two quick losses at one of Maine, UML or NU. May as well give out freebie for the games in Cincy. Especially if the UC hoops team is still in NCAA's.
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by Numbers View PostThis is debatable. The currently accepted way to do the calculation means that your opponents contribution to you're RPI in each game is weighted according to home/away won/loss. Thus, losing at home to to a strong team is preferable to losing urge road to a weak team.
Still thinking through whether the last part of your statement makes sense, though. If the home loss is weighted 1.2, wouldn't you rather lose to the weaker team on the road with the .8 weighting?
I'd still think that the breakdown of who you beat or lose to wouldn't be as important as where the games are played. I wonder how much of an effect this is having on keeping Wisconsin in relatively good PWR position, with their terrible road record... losing on the road only counts .8 in the RPI, but with almost all their wins being at home, those only count .8, that would seem to offset.
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by Steve_MN View PostI'd still think that the breakdown of who you beat or lose to wouldn't be as important as where the games are played. I wonder how much of an effect this is having on keeping Wisconsin in relatively good PWR position, with their terrible road record... losing on the road only counts .8 in the RPI, but with almost all their wins being at home, those only count .8, that would seem to offset.
In UW's case (someone could double check for me, but I think I'm right), the records are as follows:
Overall: 19-9-2 (.667)
Home: 17-2-1 (.875)
Away: 2-7-1 (.250)
The two home losses and the two away wins would cancel each other out, but there are still ten more home wins than away losses, so that's still a net benefit in the overall RPI calculation because Wisconsin is (overall) a winning team.
The odd thing is that, IMO, you're wrong when you say "keeping Wisconsin in a relatively good PWR position". Really, if anything the weighting system is keeping UW at a lower RPI than they could be. That difference of having 10 more home wins than road losses is calculated at a 0.8 weighting, instead of the equal weighting it used to have before the home/away bonus was introduced.If you want to be a BADGER, just come along with me
BRING BACK PAT RICHTER!!!
At his graduation ceremony from the U of Minnesota, my cousin got a keychain. When asked what UW gave her for graduation, my sister said, "A degree from a University that matters."
Canned music is a pathetic waste of your time.
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by ExileOnDaytonStreet View PostThey would offset with a .500 record, where the home and road results were inverses of each other.
In UW's case (someone could double check for me, but I think I'm right), the records are as follows:
Overall: 19-9-2 (.667)
Home: 17-2-1 (.875)
Away: 2-7-1 (.250)
The two home losses and the two away wins would cancel each other out, but there are still ten more home wins than away losses, so that's still a net benefit in the overall RPI calculation because Wisconsin is (overall) a winning team.
The odd thing is that, IMO, you're wrong when you say "keeping Wisconsin in a relatively good PWR position". Really, if anything the weighting system is keeping UW at a lower RPI than they could be. That difference of having 10 more home wins than road losses is calculated at a 0.8 weighting, instead of the equal weighting it used to have
And you're definitely right that it's certainly possible that it's holding Wisconsin back instead of propping them up. My best guess is that the the effect is very minor. Taking a closer look (and putting the knowledge of their road record out of my mind that raised the question in the first palce) I see that Wisconsin is currently 6th in RPI/PWR, 8th in Win Percentage and 7th in KRACH, so, realistically, any RPI/PWR in the 6-8 range would seem to be the proper place, regardless of weighting, etc.Last edited by Steve_MN; 02-25-2014, 01:04 PM.
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
This week’s brackets
West Regional (St. Paul):
13 Colgate vs. 2 Minnesota
10 North Dakota vs. 6 Wisconsin
Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
14 Michigan vs. 4 Ferris State
12 Vermont vs. 5 St. Cloud State
Northeast Regional (Worcester):
16 Mercyhurst vs. 1 Boston College
11 Cornell vs. 8 Massachusetts-Lowell
East Regional (Bridgeport):
15 Notre Dame vs. 3 Union
9 Northeastern vs. 7 Quinnipiac
This week's USCHO.com brackets. My thoughts are the West Regional is a brutal region with Minnesota, Wisconsin, and two teams gaining steam in North Dakota and Colgate. BC has the easiest region in the East. Northeast regional is a toss up. I think any of those 4 teams could win it. Midwest bracket is not bad either. Likely a Ferris vs. St. Cloud final as Michigan is fading quickly.
http://www.uscho.com/bracketology/20...west-regional/QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY BOBCATS
ECAC Regular Season Champions
2013, 2015, 2016, 2019
ECAC Tournament Champions
2016
NCAA Tournament
2002, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2019
NCAA Frozen Four
2013, 2016
https://www.bobcatshockeyblog.com/
https://twitter.com/QHockeyBlog
https://www.instagram.com/bobcatshockeyblog/
https://www.facebook.com/QHockeyBlog/
Comment
-
Originally posted by QUAlum2004 View PostThis week's USCHO.com brackets. My thoughts are the West Regional is a brutal region with Minnesota, Wisconsin, and two teams gaining steam in North Dakota and Colgate. BC has the easiest region in the East. Northeast regional is a toss up. I think any of those 4 teams could win it. Midwest bracket is not bad either. Likely a Ferris vs. St. Cloud final as Michigan is fading quickly.
http://www.uscho.com/bracketology/20...west-regional/@MNState0fHockey on Twitter
On the Web at www.mnhockeycentral.com
High School, Gophers, and Wild News on Facebook at Minnesota Hockey Central
Comment
-
Re: The 2014 Pairwise, Bracketology and History Thread`
Originally posted by mnstate0fhockey View PostSwitch St. Cloud and Wisconsin. Both would be good draws in St. Paul, but I think Wisconsin would draw better than St. Cloud in Cincy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnk View PostCant if you want to avoid interconference matchup.@MNState0fHockey on Twitter
On the Web at www.mnhockeycentral.com
High School, Gophers, and Wild News on Facebook at Minnesota Hockey Central
Comment
Comment