Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Greg Ambrose
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by Darius View Post
    If Coach Tortorella leaves, Mike Bavis is available. Thoughts?
    What does Bavis bring to the table? Yes, an assistant for Jack for several years, lead recruiter after Quinn left. With all the roster turmoil that BU has had over the past couple of years, I would wonder about Bavis's evaluation skills. Not so much that the kids he brought in can't play, but that some of them never seemed invested in the college experience. And as much as I respect Tortorella's abilities as a defensive coach, if he goes I would want someone younger, with knowledge of course, and who can bring new energy to the program. Now, maybe that is Bavis, maybe it's a UNH alum, maybe they cherry pick someone from another top D1 program. But whatever they do, they better do it fast and not bumble around like Maine has.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darius
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    If Coach Tortorella leaves, Mike Bavis is available. Thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • C-H-C
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Maine will reportedly announce it's new Head Coach early next week. If Coach Tortorella gets the job, it will be an important loss for UNH. Tortorella taught the last two UNH teams how to play team defense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Verkligen
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by Greg Ambrose View Post
    I have to think that Providence losing Krug and Bartkowski to the big club didn't help their chances.
    Ditto.

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg Ambrose
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by unh1982 View Post
    On a lighter side watched wilks Scranton complete a miraculous comeback winning last 4 games against #1 providence bruins..key players for wilks were Trevor Smith who got ot winner in game six and Paul Thompson.. Great to watch them play . Trevor leading in play off scoring Paul not far behind
    I have to think that Providence losing Krug and Bartkowski to the big club didn't help their chances.

    Leave a comment:


  • unh1982
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    On a lighter side watched wilks Scranton complete a miraculous comeback winning last 4 games against #1 providence bruins..key players for wilks were Trevor Smith who got ot winner in game six and Paul Thompson.. Great to watch them play . Trevor leading in play off scoring Paul not far behind

    Leave a comment:


  • UNHHurstFan
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by Greg Ambrose View Post
    ...there are all these little fiefdoms that control their own little expense and revenue centers and attempt to hold onto them. There never seems to be any coordinated effort to promote all aspects of the University, the idea that we're all in this together.
    Welcome to the business side of Higher Education

    Leave a comment:


  • WNTKPROD
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    It is going to be a long off-season!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg Ambrose
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by Hux View Post
    I thought the University was taking over merchandise sales and was moving towards building a store of some sort at the Whitt?
    Haven't heard that. The Friends of UNH Hockey has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for the hockey team over the last 40 years. The concession booth revenues were a major part of this, at least during the first 10+ years of the Whit. But if what you say is true, to me it is just another example of the Balkaninzation of the University. Admittedly I am no insider, but from what I have seen over the years, there are all these little fiefdoms that control their own little expense and revenue centers and attempt to hold onto them. There never seems to be any coordinated effort to promote all aspects of the University, the idea that we're all in this together. I have often wondered if this type of thing goes on at other schools. I suppose it is just the essence of bureaucracy, but it is very disappointing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hux
    replied
    Originally posted by Greg Ambrose View Post
    No doubt internet sales have had some effect but I was told that the Friend's booth closed mainly because they could no longer afford the 20% usuary fee that the arena imposed on them. This is ancient history now but, before the Whit opened, the contract that the management company (forget their name now) had with the arena vendors required them to pay 20% of their gross income for the right to set up shop at the Whit. This fee also applied to the Friends of UNH Hockey even though it was a non-profit with the express purpose of plowing all revenues back into the hockey program. Some of us on the board at the time argued that requiring the Friends to pay was ludicrous given their mission. If it was ludicrous then, it is even more ludicrous now when every dollar earmarked to the program is important. Of course, the argument made at the time fell on deaf ears. For more than 15 years the Friends were able to absorb the fee which continued to be applied even after the University took over management of the Whit. However, as the perception of the team changed, the revenues for the booth dropped to the point that the 20% fee became such a big obstacle that it didn't make sense anymore to continue. The outcome of this decision is really disappointing. The Hardenbrooks worked very hard to make the displaying of the UNH Hockey logo among the fans a necessity. Too bad that the University didn't recognize this.
    I thought the University was taking over merchandise sales and was moving towards building a store of some sort at the Whitt?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibber
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by Darius View Post
    From the Union Leader article: "...the current logo is very horizontal - Thompson Hall on the left with the name of the university stretching far off to the right. That doesn't work in social media, where Facebook and Twitter profile pictures tend to be square..."

    My heart wants the current T_Hall logo to remain, but my head understands the importance of the above and having a logo that encompasses more than just Durham. Watching the entire video presentation is important to understanding what they are trying to accomplish.
    Definitely needed to spend 100 g's on something Kindergartners could have done for milk and cookies...

    Leave a comment:


  • Darius
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    From the Union Leader article: "...the current logo is very horizontal - Thompson Hall on the left with the name of the university stretching far off to the right. That doesn't work in social media, where Facebook and Twitter profile pictures tend to be square..."

    My heart wants the current T_Hall logo to remain, but my head understands the importance of the above and having a logo that encompasses more than just Durham. Watching the entire video presentation is important to understanding what they are trying to accomplish.

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg Ambrose
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by zoofer View Post
    Thanks Darius for stating the obvious....it has nothing to do with the sports logo....I just thought that the Cat's face logo was better then what the Know-it-alls in NY had proposed! And Greg, the Friends shut down the booth because they cannot compete with what is available online for price and variety. Heck, Dan gave up the Hockey East website so there's a lot more to it....
    No doubt internet sales have had some effect but I was told that the Friend's booth closed mainly because they could no longer afford the 20% usuary fee that the arena imposed on them. This is ancient history now but, before the Whit opened, the contract that the management company (forget their name now) had with the arena vendors required them to pay 20% of their gross income for the right to set up shop at the Whit. This fee also applied to the Friends of UNH Hockey even though it was a non-profit with the express purpose of plowing all revenues back into the hockey program. Some of us on the board at the time argued that requiring the Friends to pay was ludicrous given their mission. If it was ludicrous then, it is even more ludicrous now when every dollar earmarked to the program is important. Of course, the argument made at the time fell on deaf ears. For more than 15 years the Friends were able to absorb the fee which continued to be applied even after the University took over management of the Whit. However, as the perception of the team changed, the revenues for the booth dropped to the point that the 20% fee became such a big obstacle that it didn't make sense anymore to continue. The outcome of this decision is really disappointing. The Hardenbrooks worked very hard to make the displaying of the UNH Hockey logo among the fans a necessity. Too bad that the University didn't recognize this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck Murray
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    In an attempt (likely in vain ) to get the discussion back to hockey, here's a short video I found on the UMaine thread:

    http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/console?id=113895

    Perhaps a clue or two in there as to why UNH teams aren't known for their late season success ...

    "Work beats talent unless talent works" ... Mike Babcock 12/24/05

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck Murray
    replied
    Re: UNH Wildcats 2012-2013 Postseason Thread

    Originally posted by sonar View Post
    The UNH Director of public relations indicates in today's Foster's that the response has been mainly positive ...
    How can that be ??? .... are any of the negative views getting through to the "central administration."
    Public Relations is just a glorified offshoot of Marketing. Truth is optional, and *creativity* (i.e. "spin", "promotion", "buzz", "hot") trumps all. Style over substance. And yes, Darius ... while I did not major in marketing, I did take a course in it 30+ years ago. Not that it makes a difference, though. Most of us are qualified from our life experiences to detect BS when we hear (or read or see) it.

    Anyway, for anyone who hasn't seen what $100,000 will buy you these days logo-wise, check out the following link to the Union-Leader website, which also gifts us with some independent feedback from marketing folks. And to be fair, it doesn't seem they are too impressed either ...

    http://www.unionleader.com/apps/pbcs...130529873&NL=1

    Turns out I wasn't too far off with my earlier speculation as to what they might look like. Two of them are (presumably intentionally) shaped like an old-style computer mouse, and the fourth is a 4-paneled shield that the "experts" concede is too busy and/or undecipherable. Keep up the good work, Erika ...

    I can't believe we've been reduced to debating a new school logo ... ugh ...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X