You can't tell the difference between talking about a tweet made by a coach talking about a recruiting trip, and talking about a tweet by a kid going to the gym?
Let me give you a big hint: only one of them is tweeting for the fans.
No doubt there is a difference, but in both cases they are public posts.
As you said before I would need to get a password.
There was a discussion on one of the links that was posted when he committed to RPI that he says that he is 5'10"", but he isn't. OTOH, he could have grown.
Meirs Moore with Team Red's lone goal this afternoon (3-1 loss).......SiouxCity Musketeers @Musketeerhockey 1h
Meirs @MeirsyMan Moore (unassisted) wipes the goose egg off the board for Red. They still trail 2-1. #Musketeers #maincamp
Brandon Pirri: Turk would give it to Jagr. That's awesome! Jagr's untouchable. And he would give it to Jagr.
Meirs Moore with Team Red's lone goal this afternoon (3-1 loss).......SiouxCity Musketeers @Musketeerhockey 1h
Meirs @MeirsyMan Moore (unassisted) wipes the goose egg off the board for Red. They still trail 2-1. #Musketeers #maincamp
Good to see that he is producing offense which is his forte, since he didn't in his stay in the USHL last season.
At least from twitter account that follows games https://twitter.com/Musketeerhockey, Meirs Moore did not score any additional points at the Sioux City camp. According to that account the SC team won't be named for at least a week, but Moore's own twitter account https://twitter.com/MeirsyMan indicates that he will be playing at SC "Sioux City Musketeers of the USHL"
Maybe it's just me, but if any bystander (read: non-hacker) is able to read something without having to request permission from the posting party, it seems public to me. Whether someone who does not personally know the poster shows interest in what the poster types or places what the poster types under scrutiny is completely a different story. Why else would many people under potentially watchful eye make their personal accounts private?
Maybe it's just me, but if any bystander (read: non-hacker) is able to read something without having to request permission from the posting party, it seems public to me. Whether someone who does not personally know the poster shows interest in what the poster types or places what the poster types under scrutiny is completely a different story. Why else would many people under potentially watchful eye make their personal accounts private?
I guess that you don't understand social media either because that was exactly what I said.
Comment