Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tipsy McStagger
    replied
    Originally posted by mnstate0fhockey View Post
    I heard no one question whether it was a penalty. You could have called boarding, charging, or an elbow. Controversy was whether it was a major. And bottom line, Gophers capitalized. The refs didn't put the goals on the board. Give credit where do.

    And show me where I said the Gophers are incapable of losing to Anchorage? Seriously, this is getting comical.
    Okay, now let's get back to my point. Do you think the Gophers beat UND 9 times out of 10?

    Leave a comment:


  • mnstate0fhockey
    replied
    Originally posted by Tipsy McStagger View Post
    I would say "worst case scenario" is that the refs decide the Gopher player turned his back as the UAA player got there, they call nothing, and the Gophers lose 3-2. But I guess in your world, there is no possible way the Gophers lose to UAA, so if they were down 5-0, they probably still squeak out a tie.
    I heard no one question whether it was a penalty. You could have called boarding, charging, or an elbow. Controversy was whether it was a major. And bottom line, Gophers capitalized. The refs didn't put the goals on the board. Give credit where do.

    And show me where I said the Gophers are incapable of losing to Anchorage? Seriously, this is getting comical.

    Leave a comment:


  • Koho
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
    Compared to what he said, no, you're going to have to do a HELL of a lot better...
    Yeah, I give up.

    Leave a comment:


  • dxmnkd316
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    Originally posted by Koho View Post
    The sky is yellow and the earth is flat. (Do I win now?)
    Compared to what he said, no, you're going to have to do a HELL of a lot better...

    Leave a comment:


  • Tipsy McStagger
    replied
    Originally posted by mnstate0fhockey View Post
    Worst case scenario that "questionable call" was only a minor and the Gophers tie the game and go to overtime with momentum.
    I would say "worst case scenario" is that the refs decide the Gopher player turned his back as the UAA player got there, they call nothing, and the Gophers lose 3-2. But I guess in your world, there is no possible way the Gophers lose to UAA, so if they were down 5-0, they probably still squeak out a tie.

    Leave a comment:


  • SanTropez
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    Originally posted by Tipsy McStagger View Post
    Yeah, they capitalized. Doesn't mean they would have scored even strength. Just saying obviously UAA was in position to win the game with 5 minutes left. So maybe they beat the Gophers 1 or maybe 2 times out of ten. So to say the Gophers beat UND 9 out of 10 games is PREPOSTEROUS.

    Is your hypothetical banner that "Jan Brady U" is hanging going next to the "Yay, we beat the Gophers. Our season is complete" banner that you Gophers fans have imagined.
    That banner as well as the "we won an NCAA game" banner, yep.

    Leave a comment:


  • Koho
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    By the way, watching the Eagan goalie, I think since the Goph don't get to play outside today, in the spirit of Hockey Day in MN, Wilcox should wear a stocking cap over his helmet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tipsy McStagger
    replied
    Originally posted by SanTropez View Post
    Wrong. You have no way of knowing if the Gophers would have lost to UAA, there was still 4 minutes or so left in the 3rd (plenty of time to tie it up) and good teams capitalize on others mistakes. No one is hanging banners yet, that is what Jan Brady U does not the Gophers, sorry sport.
    Yeah, they capitalized. Doesn't mean they would have scored even strength. Just saying obviously UAA was in position to win the game with 5 minutes left. So maybe they beat the Gophers 1 or maybe 2 times out of ten. So to say the Gophers beat UND 9 out of 10 games is PREPOSTEROUS.

    Is your hypothetical banner that "Jan Brady U" is hanging going next to the "Yay, we beat the Gophers. Our season is complete" banner that you Gophers fans have imagined.

    Leave a comment:


  • SanTropez
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    Originally posted by Koho View Post
    The sky is yellow and the earth is flat. (Do I win now?)
    How about "North Dakota plays clean Hockey" ... winner winner.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tipsy McStagger
    replied
    Originally posted by Koho View Post
    On another note, I wonder if the Sioux fan who at the beginning of the year was saying Budish wasn't very good and couldn't make the UND second line has changed his opinion.
    To be fair, he didn't know Mitch MacMillan would be on the first line. Had he known that he would have tried to get Josh Birkholz another year of eligibility and recommended him for captain.

    Leave a comment:


  • mnstate0fhockey
    replied
    Originally posted by Tipsy McStagger View Post
    Absurd. While I think the Gophers are the better team, to say they would win 9 out of 10 games is absurd. The Gophers would have lost to UAA last friday without a questionable call at the end of the game. UND was tied with the Gophers in the standings for a reason. They are a good team. If they get a little more luck tonight, they can win. And the Gophers will have to put a hold on the banners they seem to be already starting to raise.
    Worst case scenario that "questionable call" was only a minor and the Gophers tie the game and go to overtime with momentum.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fighting Sioux 23
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
    That's the single most preposterous thing I have read in this thread.
    Yeah. I'll admit that probably isn't true, and was more of a reaction to my team's performance. Hyperbole happens.

    Leave a comment:


  • Koho
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
    That's the single most preposterous thing I have read in this thread.
    The sky is yellow and the earth is flat. (Do I win now?)

    Leave a comment:


  • SanTropez
    replied
    Re: North Dakota at Minnesota 1/18-1/19 - Just Ring The F*ing Bell You Pansy

    Originally posted by Tipsy McStagger View Post
    Absurd. While I think the Gophers are the better team, to say they would win 9 out of 10 games is absurd. The Gophers would have lost to UAA last friday without a questionable call at the end of the game. UND was tied with the Gophers in the standings for a reason. They are a good team. If they get a little more luck tonight, they can win. And the Gophers will have to put a hold on the banners they seem to be already starting to raise.
    Wrong. You have no way of knowing if the Gophers would have lost to UAA, there was still 4 minutes or so left in the 3rd (plenty of time to tie it up) and good teams capitalize on others mistakes. No one is hanging banners yet, that is what Jan Brady U does not the Gophers, sorry sport.

    Leave a comment:


  • mnstate0fhockey
    replied
    Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
    That's the single most preposterous thing I have read in this thread.
    Pretty much.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X