Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • yuppa12
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    why doesnt gophersports.com have the story from yesterday's game. They usually have it 15 mins after the game is over. Do they just not want negative stuff on their own web site?

    Leave a comment:


  • section16rowA
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Dude Love View Post
    That makes total sense.
    Try analogy, DL. Why am I banging my head on the wall trying shame someone who obviously has no shame. DL is a proud fan of pro rasslin' and innovator of the redneck, WOOOOOOOOOOOOO public address exclamation used to celebrate SCSU men' hockey goal at the NHC. DL is analogous to Rod Blagojevich.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirty
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by InebriatedMike View Post
    She is, to me.
    That two-timing hussy!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Rube
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Runninwiththedogs View Post
    I am, but not to Biddco.
    Both of you are probably happy of that fact.

    Leave a comment:


  • Runninwiththedogs
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by 4four4 View Post
    I always thought you were married.
    I am, but not to Biddco.

    Leave a comment:


  • InebriatedMike
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by 4four4 View Post
    I always thought you were married.
    She is, to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • 4four4
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Runninwiththedogs View Post
    He's not my boyfriend.
    I always thought you were married.

    Leave a comment:


  • MinnesotaNorthStar
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
    That's how I saw it. But people on both sides saw it differently. Oh well. It's over.
    Cade Fairchild made it a moot point....

    Leave a comment:


  • The Rube
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by UMDBulldogHockeyIsKing View Post
    That's how I saw it also.

    And Jack Connolly is a freaking magician with the puck. Y'all will get to see that in a couple weeks.
    That's how I saw it. But people on both sides saw it differently. Oh well. It's over.

    Leave a comment:


  • UMDBulldogHockeyIsKing
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by MinnesotaNorthStar View Post
    My thought on it is it didn't count because Kangas was pushed into the net by Bergman (who was helped into that position by Lucia). The puck was in front of Kangas' right pad. The initial "shot" by Bergman was saved a split second before Kangas was taken out, then it looked like it was knocked in via the ensuing collision.

    I saw two very even teams this weekend. Lucky goals happen, and UMD got the better of those and it made the difference. IMO, I thought Jack Connolly was the best player on the ice. Always seemed to be at the right place at the right time, and and some freakishly good hands.
    That's how I saw it also.

    And Jack Connolly is a freaking magician with the puck. Y'all will get to see that in a couple weeks.

    Leave a comment:


  • crazypotatoes
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Biddco View Post
    SWEEP!

    I don't care how we got the sweep I just care that we got four points on the road. Plus it was nice to show up those gopher fans with giant chews in their mouths who were reminding us how much "better" they were.
    After joking around all game about how "fluke goals don't count!!!" it was hilarious to see the GWG be a complete fluke.

    Leave a comment:


  • MinnesotaNorthStar
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Bakunin View Post
    They didn't call it a goal on the original call and couldn't determine that it was legitimate after 15 minutes of video review - I'd say that is anything but "a clear goal".

    The only thing that's clear about this weekend is UMD had some insane puck luck.
    My thought on it is it didn't count because Kangas was pushed into the net by Bergman (who was helped into that position by Lucia). The puck was in front of Kangas' right pad. The initial "shot" by Bergman was saved a split second before Kangas was taken out, then it looked like it was knocked in via the ensuing collision.

    I saw two very even teams this weekend. Lucky goals happen, and UMD got the better of those and it made the difference. IMO, I thought Jack Connolly was the best player on the ice. Always seemed to be at the right place at the right time, and and some freakishly good hands.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dude Love
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by UMDbulldogs#1 View Post
    Because it ****ed you off enough to look up 10 years of UMD vs. Minnesota game results in a weak attempt to make yourself feel better.
    That didn't **** me off. It was 2am and I was drunk & bored.

    Leave a comment:


  • UMDbulldogs#1
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Dude Love View Post
    Why is our record against Minnesota from last year relevant?
    Because it ****ed you off enough to look up 10 years of UMD vs. Minnesota game results in a weak attempt to make yourself feel better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dude Love
    replied
    Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Biddco View Post
    I will bite. Who started WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO?
    Umm...I did. I kind of thought that was implied.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X