SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

[First Time, Long Time]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

I'm gonna say that tonight was the only game he'll be suspended for.

Yup, the league is who suspended him for tonight, I doubt they are going to go back and add a couple more.

[The Rube]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

I'm gonna say that tonight was the only game he'll be suspended for.

I agree. If they change the suspension, people will be all over the WCHA for "second-guessing themselves."

[Dude Love]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

I just saw the hit on a blog, and it looked pretty deliberate. Marvin made no attempt to hit Genoway from the side--he lined him him and drove him facefirst into the glass. I wouldn't be surprised to see Marvin get a couple more games from the WCHA or SCSU.

I'm gonna say that tonight was the only game he'll be suspended for.

[Plante26]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

C'mon, Sand Vag...that's a little extreme. If this was the NHL, he'd have gotten maybe 2 games depending on how Colin Campbell felt that day. You're starting to sound like a Gopher fan with all the crying you do about officials and teams being out to get you.

I just saw the hit on a blog, and it looked pretty deliberate. Marvin made no attempt to hit Genoway from the side--he lined him him and drove him facefirst into the glass. I wouldn't be surprised to see Marvin get a couple more games from the WCHA or SCSU.

[Dude Love]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

no, no you can't. A point man dumps the puck in...you can't hit him 10 seconds later and say oh he had the puck. And if you're watching Marvin, he's keying up on him. He clearly had intent to hit Genoway and my guess is with intent to injure. It was a scumbag hit and a yearlong suspension should be in order.

C'mon, Sand Vag...that's a little extreme. If this was the NHL, he'd have gotten maybe 2 games depending on how Colin Campbell felt that day. You're starting to sound like a Gopher fan with all the crying you do about officials and teams being out to get you.

[Sloe Gin]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

Sloe is the king of the over reaction.

I am?

Geist might shoot you though, so you should probably just let him remain angry.

probably

[Dirty]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

Nothing like a good "UND whining about the Refs again" fest to make everyone else smile. Has UND ever lost a single game when it wasn't the refs fault? I didn't think so.

Tonight.

[Happy]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

Nothing like a good "UND whining about the Refs again" fest to make everyone else smile. Has UND ever lost a single game when it wasn't the refs fault? I didn't think so.

[Dirty]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

I do that just to pi$s her off.

Geist might shoot you though, so you should probably just let him remain angry.

[scsutommyboy]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

This stance doesn't make sense. You continually debate things with FTLT.

I do that just to pi$s her off.

[The Rube]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

Sloe is the king of the over reaction.



You should have just brought up his post count and lost the verbal argument that way instead.

True, and true.

1 game is fair, I guess. I would've said 2 games, if only for the attention those kinds of hits have been given in the last couple of years.

And scsutommy: take off your beer goggles and realize that it looked like intent to injure. We'll never know for sure, but it looked like it.

[scsutommyboy]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

I know for a fact that MNS has played hockey, including HS hockey if I am not mistaken, at a non-crappy HS, no less.

This particular hit was maybe not 100% to injure, but IMO I think Marvin wanted to ring his bell a little.

Then he needs to take his UND glasses off and realize it's possible he wasn't trying to hurt him. It's easy for a guy to hit someone high when you have 5 inches on them especially when they are leaning against the boards.

[scsutommyboy]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

Where did I say it wasn't against the rules to hit him high?
I'm just saying I don't believe you can argue it was automatically intent to injure.

I didn't say you did. I actually agreed with you for once.

[Dirty]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

First of all check the rules buddy. Of course you can't check him 10 seconds later, but that isn't what happend here. You clearly are clueless so I am done debating this with you.

This stance doesn't make sense. You continually debate things with FTLT.

[brianvf]

Re: SCSU @ UND - November 13-14

Yearlong?
Nice overreaction.

Sloe is the king of the over reaction.

Question for you. Have you ever played hockey?

You should have just brought up his post count and lost the verbal argument that way instead.