Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

[Goon]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

Congrats on reading the thread.

Nice to see that you're off your meds again d-nozzle.

[Biddco]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

Looks like somebody is a day early in the whole 4/20 thing.

[Tiggsy]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

UND has sold out games against lesser knowns UManitoba, Cornell, Harvard, RMU and Canisus at the REA in the past. There is not a lot to do on a cold winters night in Grand Forks, ND.

Exactly.
ND fan#1: "So do we go see the hockey game or go drink next to the tree tonight?"
ND fan #2: "Why choose? Go to the game then afterwards go drink next to the tree!"

Looks like somebody is a day early in the whole 4/20 thing.

You can't expect the people partaking in the 4/20 thing to actually know what day it is.

[dggoddard]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

-The seventh and eighth schools were only invited because the other six wanted to have a pair of whipping boys so the teams didn't just play .500 hockey and hurt their PWR. Because the seventh and eighth teams have ONE NCAA tournament win in their combined history.

They were invited because the league needed 28 conference games. What held up their invites was Notre Dame's negotiating tactics.

[Fighting Sioux 23]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

They were invited because the league needed 28 conference games. What held up their invites was Notre Dame's negotiating tactics.

I believe the NCHC is going to have 24 conference games, correct?

[dggoddard]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

I believe the NCHC is going to have 24 conference games, correct?

Excuse me 24. The coaches don't want 28 because they feel it will be too brutal. The problem is finding the Non-conference opponents.

[aparch]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

Excuse me 24. The coaches don't want 28 because they feel it will be too brutal. The problem is finding the Non-conference opponents.

Sacred Heart, American Int'l, Canisius, Saint Mary's School for the Blind (err, Notre Dame), Pick a B1G school.


Hey look, I have your non-conference slate filled out for the next decade.

[Dirty]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

Sacred Heart, American Int'l, Canisius, Saint Mary's School for the Blind (err, Notre Dame), Pick a B1G school.


Hey look, I have your non-conference slate filled out for the next decade.

So a tougher Non-Conference schedule than the nWCHA Conference schedule.

[uaafanblog]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

Nice to see that you're off your meds again d-nozzle.

If you'd simply taken the time to read the thread then you MIGHT (I'm being optimistic here) have noticed that your comment was fully redundant.

[Slap Shot]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

UND has sold out games against lesser knowns UManitoba, Cornell, Harvard, RMU and Canisus at the REA in the past. There is not a lot to do on a cold winters night in Grand Forks, ND.

Yes, but fans know that the remainder of the games area gainst higher quality opponents. I know I wouldn't be pysched about season tickets if the typical game was against lesser knowns.

[ronmexico]

Excuse me 24. The coaches don't want 28 because they feel it will be too brutal. The problem is finding the Non-conference opponents.

It's interesting to get the coaches take from someone in the know. Thanks again for nothing, pervert.

[bronconick]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

No, the NCHC was founded because:
-Five schools felt that they shouldn't have to fly into Green Bay and bus the four hours North to Houghton
-Five schools felt they were "bankrolling" the "lesser" schools by participating in the league championship when the "lesser" schools repeatedly missed out.
-Five schools felt using the B1G conference as a scapegoat would cover their true intent.
-The sixth school came along because it didn't want to be the flag bearer for a "much weakened" conference when Notre Dame left for wherever their dart landed.
-The seventh and eighth schools were only invited because the other six wanted to have a pair of whipping boys so the teams didn't just play .500 hockey and hurt their PWR. Because the seventh and eighth teams have ONE NCAA tournament win in their combined history.

I know. You wouldn't believe the time I've spent going through the archives of this site for the 2002-2005 era to find out from WCHA fans at that time what I'm supposed to say when my team sucks balls but the conference they're in is good.

I tried using Mississippi State and Ole Miss football because it was easier to find but all they do is ring cowbells and chant "SEC! SEC!'. Was hoping for something deeper. Mississippi, I know.

[ronmexico]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

I know. You wouldn't believe the time I've spent going through the archives of this site for the 2002-2005 era to find out from WCHA fans at that time what I'm supposed to say when my team sucks balls but the conference they're in is good.

I tried using Mississippi State and Ole Miss football because it was easier to find but all they do is ring cowbells and chant "SEC! SEC!'. Was hoping for something deeper. Mississippi, I know.

DG will tell you all you need to know...

[Goon]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

If you'd simply taken the time to read the thread then you MIGHT (I'm being optimistic here) have noticed that your comment was fully redundant.

As are you...

[Goon]

Re: Debunking the Myth – Who you play has a huge impact on attendance

Exactly.
ND fan#1: "So do we go see the hockey game or go drink next to the tree tonight?"
ND fan #2: "Why choose? Go to the game then afterwards go drink next to the tree!"

Trees? Wait, what?