NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

[Hammer]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

Notre Dame made less in revenue than American International?

.....................the hell?

It looks like they drew less revenue than all other reporting schools in D-1.

If that's what they're saying, I smell a rat the size of a hippopotamus.

[state of hockey]

If that's what they're saying, I smell a rat the size of a hippopotamus.

Rodents of unusual size? I don't think they exist.

[Dirty]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

It looks like they drew less revenue than all other reporting schools in D-1.

If that's what they're saying, I smell a rat the size of a hippopotamus.

I believe the word you are looking for is capybara.

[Hammer]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

We'll go with one of them too.

[scsutommyboy]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

The question is what do they consider an expense? Is cost of scholarship money included in that? If so, that is one major factor in how much it cost a school. Of course that is funny money since the school already has teachers and classes and giving players free classes really doesn't cost the school a full cost of a regular student.

[joecct]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

Now show the women's figures.

[LTsatch]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

How do more than one third of the reporting Universities and Colleges have an exact match for revenue and expenses? I manage an 8 million dollar budget for work, and there is no way that those teams are even for the year, creative accounting for sure. There is not enough information about what the expenses are and where the revenue comes from to even make this study close to realistic. You can come in here with data, but consider the source(s). Yale had 20 home games this year with approx. attendance of 60,000 knock off 500 students per game and make it 50,000 x 12 for a ticket and we are looking at 600 K just in ticket revenue, plus concessions and parking.

FWIW there is no way Sacred Heart rolled in over a million in revenue, they play in a rink worse than my high school rink one town over, and average less than 500 hundred a home game. Parking is free and the snack bar sux. less than 50K in ticket sales for the year. Caveat, they still managed to knock of Yale this year

[UMLFan]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

As a Lowell fan, the one thing I walk away from these numbers with is that this proves what many of us (Lowell fans) have thought, we have the smallest budget in Hockey East. The good thing for the Lowell numbers is that with UML now owning the arena (they didn't in 2010), selling beers and keeping all the revenues, having over 5k in the stadium per game last year, the profit should have gone up. Hopefully that means some of that money is put back into the program and increases the smallest recruiting budget in Hockey East.

[Ralph Baer]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

Now show the women's figures.

http://board.uscho.com/showthread.ph...imulus-Package!

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

How do more than one third of the reporting Universities and Colleges have an exact match for revenue and expenses? I manage an 8 million dollar budget for work, and there is no way that those teams are even for the year, creative accounting for sure. There is not enough information about what the expenses are and where the revenue comes from to even make this study close to realistic. You can come in here with data, but consider the source(s). Yale had 20 home games this year with approx. attendance of 60,000 knock off 500 students per game and make it 50,000 x 12 for a ticket and we are looking at 600 K just in ticket revenue, plus concessions and parking.

FWIW there is no way Sacred Heart rolled in over a million in revenue, they play in a rink worse than my high school rink one town over, and average less than 500 hundred a home game. Parking is free and the snack bar sux. less than 50K in ticket sales for the year. Caveat, they still managed to knock of Yale this year

Money from the administration?

I would assume that RPI's figure includes a good portion of the Student Union activity fee, and it isn't all from ticket sales, sponsorships, and the like (although I'm sure it's a good chunk).

[JDUBBS1280]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

Lots of good questions. Wish the gov website broke the revenues and expenses down further, but I would imagine that level of detail is not needed for them. And while this exercise did raise other interesting questions, I think it was interesting and am glad Jup took the time to put it together.

[IrishHockeyFan]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

I don't trust those numbers.

Neither do I.

A couple of reasons why:

Revenue figures are fairly useless unless one knows what counts as revenue and what the source of the information is. The Notre Dame figure is accurate, but it is one metric (albeit the most meaningful one for ND), ticket revenue for the 18 games Notre Dame played at the Joyce Center in the 2009-10 season. It doesn't include memorabilia, concessions, or earmarked alumni donations, among other things. At some schools those items and others (TV/Radio revenue would be one) would likely rival the ticket revenue. So for Notre Dame the revenue number lacks the data necessary to be meaningful. I'm guessing for some (most) of the other schools the same thing is true.

Expenses can be equally deceiving because for instance while the cost of one year's worth of education at Notre Dame now exceeds $50,000 for some individuals (and no it isn't really 2 or three times better than what a good public school provides), how do you really calculate how much it actually costs Notre Dame to provide it and more importantly, how is Notre Dame doing it? But included in expenses is possibly the market value of 18 scholarships at some of those schools. Notre Dame claims it spends around $23,000 in athletically related student aid per participant. Again, how do they arrive at those figures? These schools do exactly what Alton says and release self-serving numbers to whatever extent they can. If you don't think that's happening I have some prime swamp land in Florida I can make you a great deal on.

At the end of the day these numbers likely don't give a true picture at all of the amounts of money the various schools spend or make on hockey. I don't think they can begin to be accurately analyzed. There is a reason the EIA website includes the cautionary note right on their front page: Please note that valid comparisons of athletics data are possible only with study and analysis of the conditions affecting each institution.

[Osorojo]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

The amount and distribution of T.V. revenues vary from contract to contract. Nevertheless, to the best of my recollection there have never been any specifics cited on this forum regarding the revenue from T.V. contracts or the distribution of these revenues. Conclusions about "NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not" have to address media revenues and their distribution to have any credibility.

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

The amount and distribution of T.V. revenues vary from contract to contract. Nevertheless, to the best of my recollection there have never been any specifics cited on this forum regarding the revenue from T.V. contracts or the distribution of these revenues. Conclusions about "NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not" have to address media revenues and their distribution to have any credibility.

That money doesn't go to the schools, DuMass.

[CLS]

Re: NCAA Hockey - Who's Making $$$, Who's Not

Expenses are also deceiving because of different ways accounting for the cost of the facility. Sometimes the expense figures are only operating expenses, with the cost of the hockey rink in some captial account, and sometimes maintenance is in some university-wide facilty maintenance account. Those numbers can be significant.