UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

[Patronick]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Thompson needs to go back to forward, which I think everyone agrees with. Question: how would Lyles fare at F? He's good with the puck and he can shoot...it's just his defensive coverage that gives me an ulcer. Thoughts?

[Patronick]

NESN has the ref reviewing the goal wearing a microphone so you can hear him while he's reviewing. Kind of a cool concept. He was looking to make sure Wilson's tip wasn't a high stick. It obviously wasn't so the goal was upheld.

Fun game to watch.....just scored to go 3-1 as I type this!

Edit: Under review again...

The showing of the review audio/video was awesome. Shea was very thorough and it was interesting hearing him talk through it.

[bigeasy29]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Lowell is looking a lot better from yesterday! Doug looks solid in net tonight! One more period to go! Lets go Lowell!!!

[bigeasy29]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

The showing of the review audio/video was awesome. Shea was very thorough and it was interesting hearing him talk through it.

I agree the ref did an awesome job on that review. He looked at all the angles to get it right.

[bigeasy29]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

MaryK saw you on tv.

[leswp1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Who was that running up and down the stairs

[bigeasy29]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Who was that running up and down the stairs

i don't know.

[leswp1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

ugh.

listening to Bob it sounds llike the refs should be whistling dixie they are missing so many penalties I love Bob.

[bigeasy29]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

you got one right!ugh.

[J.D.]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Thompson needs to go back to forward, which I think everyone agrees with. Question: how would Lyles fare at F? He's good with the puck and he can shoot...it's just his defensive coverage that gives me an ulcer. Thoughts?

I have nothing against Lyles...hope he starts to play better for you guys. I actually think he could serve a 4th line, limited role. I guess the question would be, do you even need that? Or are your lines set?

[UMLFan]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Been offline all day, but finally got home and watching this game as it just ended. Happily. Very very happily.

Too many mistakes and penalties tonight by the Hawks. BU made the Hawks pay for just about every one. A nice win for the Terriers. Boy, can they pass the puck on the PP.

I give the Hawks credit they never stopped working. Hopefully they can bounce back tomorrow night.

I noticed that last night as well, they didn't quit. I love that.

Tonight - Lowell 4 - BU 2

Could you please also tell me tomorrow's winning lottery numbers?

We've had a great ride so far... and I know there are a few of us here who are waiting for the bottom to drop out. Stop it, and stop it now. There is no reason we can't win tonight... NONE. This game could have just as easily been 4-1 UML with BU on their heels. There were deficiencies last night... those get worked on. Bottom line we're in this and we're not going down the road of some ill-fated tragic script.

At least its not my script... oh shucks we lost again stuff will get us nowhere. It is not the time to concede. Two points tonight.

Honestly Pat, great post.

What would a game against BU be without a reviewed goal. What were they looking for?

Edit- 2 goals reviewed. The first was good.... aaaand so is the second

Was it just me, or did it seem that Shea was looking for a reason to say no-goal? "Let's see this angle, OK, that looks clean, but let's see one more angle!"

What a win by the boys tonight. So proud.

[bigeasy29]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Lowell wins! Hello second place.

[gochiefs]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Tonight - Lowell 4 - BU 2

Great prediction!!

[leswp1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Amazing what discipline does to the game plan- no (almost) stupid penalties and voila~!

[Carmine Scarpaglia]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Was it just me, or did it seem that Shea was looking for a reason to say no-goal? "Let's see this angle, OK, that looks clean, but let's see one more angle!"

It was just you.