Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)
At the start of the season truthfully I thought we were a .500 team if the freshman came in and provided some scoring.
Then we lost mcCarthy and the freshman D were having more trouble adjusting to D1 than the Medvec/Miller/Lawson group did and
thus a .500 team was not very likely considering the league we play in.
Then Brickley went down and even thou the team is playing better and the scores are close we lack the scoring touch to finish and
thus we keep coming up just short game after game.
After Stalberg the next 3 best forwards right now are freshman which is good for next year, if the freshman were not scoring and
we were losing close games than I would be really worried.
Umass is undefeated at home and we played them right down to the end, better than BC did in losing a few days before 4-0.
#1 thing for the last month should be NO BAD INJURYS and NO PLAYER DEFECTIONS...we get that and maybe next year we can
stop talking about moral victorys.
At the start of the season truthfully I thought we were a .500 team if the freshman came in and provided some scoring.
Then we lost mcCarthy and the freshman D were having more trouble adjusting to D1 than the Medvec/Miller/Lawson group did and
thus a .500 team was not very likely considering the league we play in.
Then Brickley went down and even thou the team is playing better and the scores are close we lack the scoring touch to finish and
thus we keep coming up just short game after game.
After Stalberg the next 3 best forwards right now are freshman which is good for next year, if the freshman were not scoring and
we were losing close games than I would be really worried.
Umass is undefeated at home and we played them right down to the end, better than BC did in losing a few days before 4-0.
#1 thing for the last month should be NO BAD INJURYS and NO PLAYER DEFECTIONS...we get that and maybe next year we can
stop talking about moral victorys.
Comment