Originally posted by Ralph Baer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Realignment Rumors
Collapse
X
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by du78 View PostThe HE teams are already making pilgrimages out west so why not wind them into an interlocking schedule. For example in the past 7 seasons, BC, BU, VT, ME, UMass, Umass-Lowell and Northeastern have all traveled to DU for one to two games with BU and BC coming multiple times. Next year Providence is coming out to DU for the Denver Cup to play 2 games with one most likely against DU. DU has traveled to BC, Northeastern, BU, UMass, ME and VT in the past 7 seasons. Next season they are going to play BC and BU on back to back nights. HE schools have also traveled to play CC and UND. Seems perfectly plausible to me to put together the 6-team conference with 20 league games and an interlocking schedule with HE. You could play 8 interlocking games with 4 home and 4 away. The HE teams would only need to make 2 road trips per year in that scenario as the games out west would all be 2-game series. The western teams can come east twice a year and play some back-to-back games against single opponents. For the western teams that would leave 6 OOC games they could still schedule.Last edited by Ralph Baer; 04-20-2011, 12:06 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
To me conference realignments should make sense for the participants before I start believing in the possibility. I don't understand how an anti-Big 10 conference benefits those schools over their present situation. While the Big 10 had money as the overriding reason to form that conference, I don't see an enhanced TV deal out of this, nor a strengthening of rivalries to boost attendance. All I do see are increased travel costs as have been mentioned already as well as a lot tougher road to reach the NCAA's.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
The HE teams are already making pilgrimages out west so why not wind them into an interlocking schedule. For example in the past 7 seasons, BC, BU, VT, ME, UMass, Umass-Lowell and Northeastern have all traveled to DU for one to two games with BU and BC coming multiple times. Next year Providence is coming out to DU for the Denver Cup to play 2 games with one most likely against DU. DU has traveled to BC, Northeastern, BU, UMass, ME and VT in the past 7 seasons. Next season they are going to play BC and BU on back to back nights. HE schools have also traveled to play CC and UND. Seems perfectly plausible to me to put together the 6-team conference with 20 league games and an interlocking schedule with HE. You could play 8 interlocking games with 4 home and 4 away. The HE teams would only need to make 2 road trips per year in that scenario as the games out west would all be 2-game series. The western teams can come east twice a year and play some back-to-back games against single opponents. For the western teams that would leave 6 OOC games they could still schedule.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by Almington View PostI think that a conference of SCSU, UMD, BSU, MTU, NMU and MSUM would have some stability should an Anti-6 conference form and the political pressure inside MN might be enough to keep MN playing those teams (at least the 4 MN based teams) on a semi-regular basis.
The real losers would be the other 6 teams: UAA, UA(F), Ferris, WMU, LSSU, and BGSU. Those neams needing a home may cause a cascade through AH and ECAC breaking the teams up into 3 or 4 smaller conferences.
I think that at the end of the day if all that happens, 2 major changes happen:
1.) college hockey loses between 2-4 teams
2.) The tournament returns to a 12 team format.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by davyd83 View PostThe most preposterous thing about the proposed MIA, NDAME, NDAK, UNO, CC, DU conference is the fact that, other than Denver-CC and Miami-Notre Dame, every road trip is 499 miles or more, with 60% of trips over 800 miles. That doesn't seem too cost effective.Originally posted by 4four4 View PostWhich is why the new proposed rumor will never happen.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by 4four4 View PostWhich is why the new proposed rumor will never happen.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by dggoddard View PostSupposedly the "Super Six Conference" would have an interlocking schedule with Hockey East.
You can bet that the coaching shake-ups and rumors this offseason are tied to possible realignment.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by davyd83 View PostThe most preposterous thing about the proposed MIA, NDAME, NDAK, UNO, CC, DU conference is the fact that, other than Denver-CC and Miami-Notre Dame, every road trip is 499 miles or more, with 60% of trips over 800 miles. That doesn't seem too cost effective.
Originally posted by peten16 View PostBecause clearly those teams dominated this year!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by moose97 View PostAnd here is the real kicker. The current situation is said to be not conducive to expansion (full conferences). How is the following scenario any better?:
BTHC - 6 - only open to more B1G schools
Anti-BTHC - UND, UND, Miami, UNO, CC, DU - only open to "power" teams
the "left-over" conference/s - whoever doesn't fold that's left from the C/WCHA - open to expansion, but like the CHA, who would want to spend money so they could join this group of out-casts?
The real losers would be the other 6 teams: UAA, UA(F), Ferris, WMU, LSSU, and BGSU. Those neams needing a home may cause a cascade through AH and ECAC breaking the teams up into 3 or 4 smaller conferences.
I think that at the end of the day if all that happens, 2 major changes happen:
1.) college hockey loses between 2-4 teams
2.) The tournament returns to a 12 team format.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by dggoddard View PostSupposedly the "Super Six Conference" would have an interlocking schedule with Hockey East.
You can bet that the coaching shake-ups and rumors this offseason are tied to possible realignment.
What if we put the D-I's with the D-I's and the D-II play-ups with the D-II's? And then the NCAA puts in a National Collegiate Championship for D-I/II.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Realignment Rumors
Originally posted by Almington View PostExpansion will only occur with stable conferences, not with conferences where teams are always on the verge of folding the program.
BTHC - 6 - only open to more B1G schools
Anti-BTHC - UND, UND, Miami, UNO, CC, DU - only open to "power" teams
the "left-over" conference/s - whoever doesn't fold that's left from the C/WCHA - open to expansion, but like the CHA, who would want to spend money so they could join this group of out-casts?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: