Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Realignment Rumors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • joecct
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by ExileOnDaytonStreet View Post
    This of course brings up the question: why doesn't the NCAA just have a "collegiate" hockey championship for D-I and D-II together?
    BINGO!!!!

    And, then start making conferences based on fiscal sanity, not "prestige". For example, combine the GLIAC and the Northern Sun hockey schools into one conference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ralph Baer
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by Shirtless Guy View Post
    Interesting, I would think RIT might not since they are in fact playing up with no scholarships so there is no inequality by Title IX standards? As for the other DIII schools, I'm pretty sure they have to play up in something right now to be compliant with Title IX, IE Colorado College has D1 Women's Soccer. The DII schools are different because its about total scholarship athletes, not D1 athletes vs D2 athletes.
    Good points about the D-II schools. Besides RIT, the other D-III schools all have a D-I women's team. All except CC are in hockey. Union, like RIT, can't give scholarships, but it's women's team is D-I.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shirtless Guy
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by Ralph Baer View Post
    I assume that RIT would be able to move their women's program to D-I claiming based on Title 9 as could any other school with a D-I men's program but no D-I women's program.
    Interesting, I would think RIT might not since they are in fact playing up with no scholarships so there is no inequality by Title IX standards? As for the other DIII schools, I'm pretty sure they have to play up in something right now to be compliant with Title IX, IE Colorado College has D1 Women's Soccer. The DII schools are different because its about total scholarship athletes, not D1 athletes vs D2 athletes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ralph Baer
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by Craig P. View Post
    No new play-ups. As the part you bolded makes clear, the existing play-ups are grandfathered in.
    I assume that RIT would be able to move their women's program to D-I claiming based on Title 9 as could any other school with a D-I men's program but no D-I women's program.

    Leave a comment:


  • Craig P.
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    BTW, folks. No more play-ups. Effective August 1, 2011.
    No new play-ups. As the part you bolded makes clear, the existing play-ups are grandfathered in.

    Leave a comment:


  • ExileOnDaytonStreet
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by Patman View Post
    Uh... no, that is completely wrong. Men's D1 hockey is not given that designation.
    This of course brings up the question: why doesn't the NCAA just have a "collegiate" hockey championship for D-I and D-II together?

    Leave a comment:


  • Patman
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by CHFAN222 View Post
    It won't effect hockey if the school is D-II since there is no championship in D-II.
    Uh... no, that is completely wrong. Men's D1 hockey is not given that designation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shirtless Guy
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by CHFAN222 View Post
    It won't effect hockey if the school is D-II since there is no championship in D-II.
    It shouldn't but who knows for sure...

    Leave a comment:


  • CHFAN222
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    BTW, folks. No more play-ups. Effective August 1, 2011.
    It won't effect hockey if the school is D-II since there is no championship in D-II.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patman
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    BTW, folks. No more play-ups. Effective August 1, 2011.
    nothing like a good ol' act of spite

    Leave a comment:


  • Zyklon
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    BTW, folks. No more play-ups. Effective August 1, 2011.
    link to official document?

    Leave a comment:


  • joecct
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    BTW, folks. No more play-ups. Effective August 1, 2011.

    2010-100
    DIVISION MEMBERSHIP -- ELIMINATION OF PROVISIONAL AND MULTIDIVISIONAL MEMBERSHIP -- RECLASSIFICATION PROCESS AND MULTISPORT CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS
    Status: Adopted - Final

    20.4.1.1 Division I Member. A member of Division I may petition to be classified in football in the Bowl Subdivision or the NCAA Championship Subdivision. A member of Division II or Division III may have a sport classified in Division I, provided the sport was so classified during the 2010-11 academic year. Such a classification shall continue until the institution fails to conduct the sport in Division I in any following academic year.

    Leave a comment:


  • aparch
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by gophfan View Post
    Most of the schools in the CCHA is sucking off the teat of Michigan,michigan state and Ohio State
    Really? tOSU really kept the CCHA solvent all these years?


    Originally posted by yooper(UP) hockey View Post
    If that is the case what is going happen to the CCHA when the Big 10 forms?
    Uhh... Welcome to six months ago. Could you do us all a favor and warn Japan about the Earthquake and Typhoon why you're time traveling please?

    Leave a comment:


  • yooper(UP) hockey
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Originally posted by gophfan View Post
    Most of the schools in the CCHA is sucking off the teat of Michigan,michigan state and Ohio State
    If that is the case what is going happen to the CCHA when the Big 10 forms?

    Leave a comment:


  • gophfan
    replied
    Re: Realignment Rumors

    Most of the schools in the CCHA is sucking off the teat of Michigan,michigan state and Ohio State

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X