After the lackluster major penalty, I thought Cornell played very well in the 1st. In the 2d, they were pretty dominant in the St. Lawrence power plays early, but never really go organized as the period progressed. Obviously with only a one goal lead, any defensive let down could be disastrous. I'm thinking in general Cornell has played better (shots 19-4), but the game is far from secure.
Good third period for SLU (that's all I heard, but 4 SOG through 2 doesn't look too good!). 1-0 final.
No Flanagan, no Hughes, no Wick . . . all in all, I'd say that was actually a pretty good effort, especially late in the game, and especially by Weninger. No points for trying hard, but giving up one goal to Cornell and staying in it for 60 minutes are positives.
Good third period for SLU (that's all I heard, but 4 SOG through 2 doesn't look too good!). 1-0 final.
No Flanagan, no Hughes, no Wick . . . all in all, I'd say that was actually a pretty good effort, especially late in the game, and especially by Weninger. No points for trying hard, but giving up one goal is a positive.
SLU controlled the third period. Both teams had bad puck luck -- it could easily have been a 3-2 game.
Comment