Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Michigan OT Goal
Collapse
X
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and after looking at the far distant replay from the other end of the ice, it does APPEAR as though the puck had crossed the line. Problem with that is the angle can't be determined because the shot was from 100 feet away.
Here is the only issue I have with the whole situation. The call on the ice is no goal. Two things: 1) if it takes 10 minutes to find the puck, aren't we trying to find a way to CALL it a goal, instead of confirming the call on the ice?, 2) if you have to call three other people in to see the replays, isn't that THE VERY definition of "inconclusive?" If one guy can't determine that it is a goal, it automatically is inconclusive.
I will be at peace when someone can refute the above....with a justifiable explanation of how those two things are NOT true....If we could extend Blais' contract, that'd be greeeaaatttt
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
Originally posted by gomavs#1 View PostI'm not a conspiracy theorist, and after looking at the far distant replay from the other end of the ice, it does APPEAR as though the puck had crossed the line. Problem with that is the angle can't be determined because the shot was from 100 feet away.
Here is the only issue I have with the whole situation. The call on the ice is no goal. Two things: 1) if it takes 10 minutes to find the puck, aren't we trying to find a way to CALL it a goal, instead of confirming the call on the ice?, 2) if you have to call three other people in to see the replays, isn't that THE VERY definition of "inconclusive?" If one guy can't determine that it is a goal, it automatically is inconclusive."Hockey is the only tribe I belong to." --Jack Falla
"Why, as a matter of fact, I suggested starting a hockey program to Father Callahan, our president. He was downright interested until we came to the use of sticks, and then he threw up his hands. He said, 'No, that game is not for our University. Notre Dame will never endorse any game that puts a club in the hands of an Irishman.' " -- Knute Rockne: All American
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
The officials are only permitted to use the overhead view for review rulings. If there was irrefutable evidence to overturn the ref's initial "no goal" call then I'm a Wolverine! When they interviewed Piotrowski on the ruling it was all bulls**t from him, that guy has thrown more games in his career than I can remember plus he and Red are best golfing buddies in the off season.
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
Originally posted by gomavs#1 View PostI'm not a conspiracy theorist, and after looking at the far distant replay from the other end of the ice, it does APPEAR as though the puck had crossed the line. Problem with that is the angle can't be determined because the shot was from 100 feet away.
Here is the only issue I have with the whole situation. The call on the ice is no goal. Two things: 1) if it takes 10 minutes to find the puck, aren't we trying to find a way to CALL it a goal, instead of confirming the call on the ice?, 2) if you have to call three other people in to see the replays, isn't that THE VERY definition of "inconclusive?" If one guy can't determine that it is a goal, it automatically is inconclusive.
I will be at peace when someone can refute the above....with a justifiable explanation of how those two things are NOT true....Originally posted by CavalryNateDisrespecting the Gophers is like disowning your mother the first time you get a girlfriend.
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
Glad to see my suspicions on the definition of "inconclusive" are being confirmed. Either way, third place in the WCHA in our first year is not a bad start. We didn't get our business done with Bemidji and we were lucky that things fell into place to get into the Big Skate. Mavs have a bright future....If we could extend Blais' contract, that'd be greeeaaatttt
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
Originally posted by gomavs#1 View PostI'm not a conspiracy theorist, and after looking at the far distant replay from the other end of the ice, it does APPEAR as though the puck had crossed the line. Problem with that is the angle can't be determined because the shot was from 100 feet away.
Here is the only issue I have with the whole situation. The call on the ice is no goal. Two things: 1) if it takes 10 minutes to find the puck, aren't we trying to find a way to CALL it a goal, instead of confirming the call on the ice?, 2) if you have to call three other people in to see the replays, isn't that THE VERY definition of "inconclusive?" If one guy can't determine that it is a goal, it automatically is inconclusive.
I will be at peace when someone can refute the above....with a justifiable explanation of how those two things are NOT true....
Not very nice.
On the bright side.. you have Blaise.. UNO will be back.GO NU HOCKEY
Always bullish on the future.
We don't always win Hockey East or the Beanpot (#trilogy).. but when we do.. we are the Champions
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
Originally posted by Hockeybuckeye View PostThe officials are only permitted to use the overhead view for review rulings.
From the rulebook:
Logistics and Equipment. The instant-replay official must be located in a
secluded area of the building with an unobstructed view of the ice surface.
The location must be large enough to seat three people and have space
necessary for monitors, replay and recording equipment.
The instant-replay official must be provided with a 20-inch monitor for
replay, with other equipment to be designated by the tournament committee.
All potential replay angles will be made available for review. All relevant
personnel shall be made aware of what angles will be available.
The instant-replay official must be supplied a telephone with direct
contact to the timer’s bench.
HR-104 Appendix C
For NCAA tournament competition, the NCAA will be responsible for the
expenses involved with wiring the replay equipment.
The television producer shall “burn in” the game clock showing the time
remaining in the period during the last minute of each period.Last edited by Greyeagle; 03-26-2011, 10:12 AM.
Minnesota's Pride On Ice: 1974, 1976, 1979, 2002 & 2003 NCAA National Champions
And the preacher said, you know you always have the Lord by your side
And I was so pleased to be informed of this that I ran
Twenty red lights in his honor
Thank you Jesus, thank you Lord
~Mick Jagger/Keith Richards
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
Originally posted by Greyeagle View PostDetroit Red Wings - Stanley Cup Champions 08, 02, 98, 97, 55, 54, 52, 50, 43, 37, 36
Arsenal FC - League Champions 04, 02, 98, 91, 89, 71, 53, 48, 38, 35, 34, 33, 31
Proud member of the Coalition of the Swilling
UNH Wildcats
ECAC Tourney Champs 79
Hockey East Regular Season Champs 09-10, 07-08, 06-07, 02-03, 01-02, 98-99, 96-97, 91-92
Hockey East Tourney Champs 03, 02
Frozen Four 03, 02, 99, 98, 82, 79, 77
NCAA Champ. Game 03, 99
Comment
-
Re: The Michigan OT Goal
Originally posted by wolverine318 View Postright here
*****http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7052/goalo.jpg******Detroit Red Wings - Stanley Cup Champions 08, 02, 98, 97, 55, 54, 52, 50, 43, 37, 36
Arsenal FC - League Champions 04, 02, 98, 91, 89, 71, 53, 48, 38, 35, 34, 33, 31
Proud member of the Coalition of the Swilling
UNH Wildcats
ECAC Tourney Champs 79
Hockey East Regular Season Champs 09-10, 07-08, 06-07, 02-03, 01-02, 98-99, 96-97, 91-92
Hockey East Tourney Champs 03, 02
Frozen Four 03, 02, 99, 98, 82, 79, 77
NCAA Champ. Game 03, 99
Comment
Comment