Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Final Computer Rankings of the Season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Final Computer Rankings of the Season

    Here they are - by my numbers, STS should have been in instead of Gustavus, and the committe made the right call re Mville/Elmira

    Code:
    		G	W	L	Rating		Last Rank
    1	OSW	27	25	2	711	707	1
    2	NRW	28	25	3	690	689	2
    3	SNB	27	22.5	4.5	673	670	3
    4	MID	27	21	6	671	658	5
    5	PLT	27	20	7	663	668	4
    6	BOW	26	19.5	6.5	652	652	6
    7	STS	28	20	8	633	634	7
    8	WIL	25	16.5	8.5	622	622	10
    9	ELM	27	18.5	8.5	622	628	8
    10	GAC	27	20	7	616	626	9
    11	AMH	25	18	7	615	618	11
    12	HML	26	18	8	611	610	12
    13	MAN	27	20.5	6.5	609	601	15
    14	TRN	26	16	10	602	610	12
    15	ADR	27	24	3	602	593	17
    16	WRF	29	19	10	597	602	14
    17	HAM	26	16	10	592	599	16
    18	FIT	27	20.5	6.5	584	590	19
    19	WEN	25	19.5	5.5	581	592	18
    20	SAL	27	16	11	578	557	30
    21	STA	27	16.5	10.5	577	572	20
    22	CLB	24	13	11	574	572	20
    23	CUR	28	19.5	8.5	574	566	24
    24	WSR	27	12.5	14.5	568	570	22
    25	WST	27	12	15	566	568	23
    26	TUF	25	13.5	11.5	565	564	25
    27	BAB	28	15	13	562	560	27
    28	HOB	26	14.5	11.5	560	560	27
    29	NEU	27	16.5	10.5	560	562	26
    30	FRE	26	18	8	556	558	29
    31	WEC	27	10	17	555	557	30
    32	STT	27	15	12	551	538	36
    33	NEC	27	12	15	541	540	34
    34	AUG	27	16.5	10.5	540	542	32
    35	GEN	25	14	11	539	539	35
    36	WSP	28	12.5	15.5	539	541	33
    37	PLY	27	17.5	9.5	533	538	36
    38	CST	26	11.5	14.5	530	533	38
    39	MAR	27	20	7	530	532	39
    40	STO	26	14	12	527	529	40
    41	MOR	26	9	17	520	523	41
    42	POT	25	10	15	517	519	42
    43	UMB	25	11	14	516	517	43
    44	SOM	26	10.5	15.5	515	514	44
    45	BEC	25	13.5	11.5	509	514	44
    46	CTC	24	8.5	15.5	506	507	46
    47	WFS	26	13.5	12.5	499	506	47
    48	BRC	27	14.5	12.5	498	499	49
    49	SKD	27	10	17	497	502	48
    50	WES	22	8	14	487	487	50
    51	STJ	25	11	14	484	484	51
    52	SUF	26	12.5	13.5	482	481	52
    53	BET	25	10	15	477	479	53
    54	J&W	28	12.5	15.5	474	455	59
    55	UTC	26	10	16	474	475	54
    56	NIC	25	14.5	10.5	469	470	55
    57	MSE	27	15	12	468	467	56
    58	UMD	27	11.5	15.5	466	456	58
    59	CNC	25	7.5	17.5	466	465	57
    60	AMP	25	12.5	12.5	448	447	62
    61	STM	27	8.5	18.5	447	454	60
    62	CRT	25	7	18	446	448	61
    63	WOR	25	7	18	437	438	63
    64	BFS	25	6.5	18.5	434	434	64
    65	LKF	27	10	17	419	420	65
    66	STN	27	11.5	15.5	418	420	65
    67	UNE	25	3	22	407	408	67
    68	LAW	28	11	17	401	401	68
    69	FPU	25	8	17	399	401	68
    70	SNH	23	6.5	16.5	391	390	70
    71	FRA	24	3	21	359	360	71
    72	FNL	25	6.5	18.5	344	344	72
    73	STR	25	1.5	23.5	341	342	73
    74	NLD	27	5.5	21.5	339	340	74
    75	CNW	25	2.5	22.5	334	334	75
    76	WNE	24	3.5	20.5	324	323	76
    77	SLV	26	1.5	24.5	300	301	77
    78	LVC	25	0	25	253	254	78
    Thus by my rankings the tournament (as selected) should have been seeded

    E1 Oswego
    E2 Norwich
    E3 Middlebury
    E4 Plattsburgh
    E5 Bowdoin
    E6 Elmira
    E7 Curry

    W1 St. Norbert
    W2 Gustavus
    W3 Adrian
    W4 St. Thomas

    Except for flipping Oswego and Norwich, and sending Adrian to SNC because of Geographic Proximity, that is how the committee did seed the tournament.

    Yes, my computer says that the team that got jobbed in all this was actually STS, not Mville.
    2007-2008 ECAC East/NESCAC Interlock Pick 'em winner
    2007-2008 Last Person Standing Winner,
    2013-2014 Last Person Standing Winner (tie)
    2016-2017 Last Person Standing Winner

  • #2
    Re: Final Computer Rankings of the Season

    Thanks NU Prof!!! The Numbers Do Not Lie!!!

    Originally posted by NUProf View Post
    Here they are - by my numbers, STS should have been in instead of Gustavus, and the committe made the right call re Mville/Elmira

    Code:
    		G	W	L	Rating		Last Rank
    1	OSW	27	25	2	711	707	1
    2	NRW	28	25	3	690	689	2
    3	SNB	27	22.5	4.5	673	670	3
    4	MID	27	21	6	671	658	5
    5	PLT	27	20	7	663	668	4
    6	BOW	26	19.5	6.5	652	652	6
    7	STS	28	20	8	633	634	7
    8	WIL	25	16.5	8.5	622	622	10
    9	ELM	27	18.5	8.5	622	628	8
    10	GAC	27	20	7	616	626	9
    11	AMH	25	18	7	615	618	11
    12	HML	26	18	8	611	610	12
    13	MAN	27	20.5	6.5	609	601	15
    14	TRN	26	16	10	602	610	12
    15	ADR	27	24	3	602	593	17
    16	WRF	29	19	10	597	602	14
    17	HAM	26	16	10	592	599	16
    18	FIT	27	20.5	6.5	584	590	19
    19	WEN	25	19.5	5.5	581	592	18
    20	SAL	27	16	11	578	557	30
    21	STA	27	16.5	10.5	577	572	20
    22	CLB	24	13	11	574	572	20
    23	CUR	28	19.5	8.5	574	566	24
    24	WSR	27	12.5	14.5	568	570	22
    25	WST	27	12	15	566	568	23
    26	TUF	25	13.5	11.5	565	564	25
    27	BAB	28	15	13	562	560	27
    28	HOB	26	14.5	11.5	560	560	27
    29	NEU	27	16.5	10.5	560	562	26
    30	FRE	26	18	8	556	558	29
    31	WEC	27	10	17	555	557	30
    32	STT	27	15	12	551	538	36
    33	NEC	27	12	15	541	540	34
    34	AUG	27	16.5	10.5	540	542	32
    35	GEN	25	14	11	539	539	35
    36	WSP	28	12.5	15.5	539	541	33
    37	PLY	27	17.5	9.5	533	538	36
    38	CST	26	11.5	14.5	530	533	38
    39	MAR	27	20	7	530	532	39
    40	STO	26	14	12	527	529	40
    41	MOR	26	9	17	520	523	41
    42	POT	25	10	15	517	519	42
    43	UMB	25	11	14	516	517	43
    44	SOM	26	10.5	15.5	515	514	44
    45	BEC	25	13.5	11.5	509	514	44
    46	CTC	24	8.5	15.5	506	507	46
    47	WFS	26	13.5	12.5	499	506	47
    48	BRC	27	14.5	12.5	498	499	49
    49	SKD	27	10	17	497	502	48
    50	WES	22	8	14	487	487	50
    51	STJ	25	11	14	484	484	51
    52	SUF	26	12.5	13.5	482	481	52
    53	BET	25	10	15	477	479	53
    54	J&W	28	12.5	15.5	474	455	59
    55	UTC	26	10	16	474	475	54
    56	NIC	25	14.5	10.5	469	470	55
    57	MSE	27	15	12	468	467	56
    58	UMD	27	11.5	15.5	466	456	58
    59	CNC	25	7.5	17.5	466	465	57
    60	AMP	25	12.5	12.5	448	447	62
    61	STM	27	8.5	18.5	447	454	60
    62	CRT	25	7	18	446	448	61
    63	WOR	25	7	18	437	438	63
    64	BFS	25	6.5	18.5	434	434	64
    65	LKF	27	10	17	419	420	65
    66	STN	27	11.5	15.5	418	420	65
    67	UNE	25	3	22	407	408	67
    68	LAW	28	11	17	401	401	68
    69	FPU	25	8	17	399	401	68
    70	SNH	23	6.5	16.5	391	390	70
    71	FRA	24	3	21	359	360	71
    72	FNL	25	6.5	18.5	344	344	72
    73	STR	25	1.5	23.5	341	342	73
    74	NLD	27	5.5	21.5	339	340	74
    75	CNW	25	2.5	22.5	334	334	75
    76	WNE	24	3.5	20.5	324	323	76
    77	SLV	26	1.5	24.5	300	301	77
    78	LVC	25	0	25	253	254	78
    Thus by my rankings the tournament (as selected) should have been seeded

    E1 Oswego
    E2 Norwich
    E3 Middlebury
    E4 Plattsburgh
    E5 Bowdoin
    E6 Elmira
    E7 Curry

    W1 St. Norbert
    W2 Gustavus
    W3 Adrian
    W4 St. Thomas

    Except for flipping Oswego and Norwich, and sending Adrian to SNC because of Geographic Proximity, that is how the committee did seed the tournament.

    Yes, my computer says that the team that got jobbed in all this was actually STS, not Mville.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Final Computer Rankings of the Season

      Prof - your rankings have Oswego with a statistically significant advantage over NU, likewise the PWC comparisons have a sizable edge for the Lakers. Is there anything in the numbers that gives Norwich the nod over Oswego? Since NU is the #1 seed in the tourney, you would think there would be a combination of the criteria that gives Norwich the nod. Find out what it is and we might have a better insight as to what categories are really important.

      I am not questioning NU being the top seed, just wondering how they got there given the supposed criteria.
      93GreatLaker

      2012-13 LPS Losers Bracket Champion
      2011-12 LPS Losers Bracket Champion
      2010-11 LPS Losers Bracket Champion
      2008-09 DIII College Hockey Pool Champion
      2008-09 SUNYAC Pick-em Champion

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Final Computer Rankings of the Season

        Originally posted by 93GreatLaker View Post
        Prof - your rankings have Oswego with a statistically significant advantage over NU, likewise the PWC comparisons have a sizable edge for the Lakers. Is there anything in the numbers that gives Norwich the nod over Oswego? Since NU is the #1 seed in the tourney, you would think there would be a combination of the criteria that gives Norwich the nod. Find out what it is and we might have a better insight as to what categories are really important.

        I am not questioning NU being the top seed, just wondering how they got there given the supposed criteria.
        I suspect in the committee's eyes they were close or they really valued OOWP, The answer to me is a big question mark. As long as both teams get a first round bye it really doesn't matter.
        2007-2008 ECAC East/NESCAC Interlock Pick 'em winner
        2007-2008 Last Person Standing Winner,
        2013-2014 Last Person Standing Winner (tie)
        2016-2017 Last Person Standing Winner

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Final Computer Rankings of the Season

          Thanks Prof, I agree it doesn't make a bit of difference. I was just curious if we could gain any insight based on the results (reverse engineering).
          93GreatLaker

          2012-13 LPS Losers Bracket Champion
          2011-12 LPS Losers Bracket Champion
          2010-11 LPS Losers Bracket Champion
          2008-09 DIII College Hockey Pool Champion
          2008-09 SUNYAC Pick-em Champion

          Comment

          Working...
          X