Re: SCSU 2009-2010 Season Thread
Lots of good banter, I like it!
I'm typically a glass half full kind of guy but this team makes it tough to stay optimistic.
I think the key is our sub standard D. They're ok defensively but are a liability when it comes to the transition game. A lot of talk in the past couple pages about various forwards not doing this or not doing that but I think a lot of that talk is misplaced.
If we had 1 or 2 more guys like Zabs - guys that can really skate and move the puck - you'd see a big jump in offensive performance. Zabs left the game in the first period on Saturday and our offense just collapsed, I don't think that is a coincidence. Teams know our weakness and they forecheck like mad because they know our guys can't move the puck.
Bottom line, Motzko has to find a way to recruit more talent on the D line. The forward talent is there but it's tough for them to showcase that talent due to the poor transition game.
Oh, and Lee has to stop being a sieve.
My .02....
Lots of good banter, I like it!
I'm typically a glass half full kind of guy but this team makes it tough to stay optimistic.
I think the key is our sub standard D. They're ok defensively but are a liability when it comes to the transition game. A lot of talk in the past couple pages about various forwards not doing this or not doing that but I think a lot of that talk is misplaced.
If we had 1 or 2 more guys like Zabs - guys that can really skate and move the puck - you'd see a big jump in offensive performance. Zabs left the game in the first period on Saturday and our offense just collapsed, I don't think that is a coincidence. Teams know our weakness and they forecheck like mad because they know our guys can't move the puck.
Bottom line, Motzko has to find a way to recruit more talent on the D line. The forward talent is there but it's tough for them to showcase that talent due to the poor transition game.
Oh, and Lee has to stop being a sieve.
My .02....
Comment