Re: Wisconsin Hockey Vol I: Dawn of the Fifth Age of UW Hockey!
I have a hard time believing that both Oz and Don G would fit together on the same staff at this point in their careers. Both I think would want to be the head guy. Maybe Gwoz would come back to UW as an assistant at this point, but not the others, IMO.
All signs (posters here) seem to be pointing towards a decision from BA that would keep it within the "Wisconsin Family" with Oz, Don G and Johnson being "our" frontrunners, seemingly. Not sure that any of these guys would make it a "knock your socks off" hire though. I wouldn't consider them to be bad hires at all - they all seem qualified, but my socks would still be on my feet.
Tough to interpret what that phrase means to other people in this context. To me it either means "awesome" or "surprising", and maybe both, but in my opinion in no way does it help us decipher who the next coach will be. It only helps fuel our speculation.
Is there a viable candidate that anyone here feels will truly be considered by BA that they feel strongly against? Curious to hear some names people do NOT want to see get the position.
I have a hard time believing that both Oz and Don G would fit together on the same staff at this point in their careers. Both I think would want to be the head guy. Maybe Gwoz would come back to UW as an assistant at this point, but not the others, IMO.
All signs (posters here) seem to be pointing towards a decision from BA that would keep it within the "Wisconsin Family" with Oz, Don G and Johnson being "our" frontrunners, seemingly. Not sure that any of these guys would make it a "knock your socks off" hire though. I wouldn't consider them to be bad hires at all - they all seem qualified, but my socks would still be on my feet.
Tough to interpret what that phrase means to other people in this context. To me it either means "awesome" or "surprising", and maybe both, but in my opinion in no way does it help us decipher who the next coach will be. It only helps fuel our speculation.
Is there a viable candidate that anyone here feels will truly be considered by BA that they feel strongly against? Curious to hear some names people do NOT want to see get the position.
Comment