Re: Arizona State Moving To D1
Which means, get ready for some lean times, because they are a comein'.
If ASU plays a hybrid schedule next year, like PSU did their first season, as they have said that they are going to do, where PSU went 13-14-0, they may be capable of posting a record that looks somewhat like that one. If they play a schedule that looks more like what UNO played in their first season of existence, where they fielded a team with players that had never played together, as they were not a club team moving up, and where they played an fairly brutal schedule:
http://www.omavs.com/SportSelect.dbm...&Q_SEASON=1997
............they are going to get pounded on a regular basis. This UNO inaugural season schedule included 9 games against teams ranked in the USCHO poll at the time.
But, this led up to UNO playing in the CCHA tourney title game, their first season in any conference, in just their 3rd season of existence, pounding Michigan, 7-4, in the tourney semi-final, on national television, in Detroit, on St. Patrick's Day, in 1998.
I firmly believe that playing a pussified hybrid schedule is not in your best interest next season. I have wondered if Penn State would have been better off this season, a down year in the Big 10, had they not done this in '12-'13. They followed that season up with an 8-26-2 record last season, the first season they played a "real" schedule.
If they had thrown themselves to the dogs that first season, would they be better off this season? I say yes.
I firmly believe that ASU will be better off if they schedule "up" and not "down", in the long run.
It's hard to soar like eagles when you are flying with a flock of turkeys.
Just my historical perspective on the topic.
Originally posted by SunDevilBob
View Post
If ASU plays a hybrid schedule next year, like PSU did their first season, as they have said that they are going to do, where PSU went 13-14-0, they may be capable of posting a record that looks somewhat like that one. If they play a schedule that looks more like what UNO played in their first season of existence, where they fielded a team with players that had never played together, as they were not a club team moving up, and where they played an fairly brutal schedule:
http://www.omavs.com/SportSelect.dbm...&Q_SEASON=1997
............they are going to get pounded on a regular basis. This UNO inaugural season schedule included 9 games against teams ranked in the USCHO poll at the time.
But, this led up to UNO playing in the CCHA tourney title game, their first season in any conference, in just their 3rd season of existence, pounding Michigan, 7-4, in the tourney semi-final, on national television, in Detroit, on St. Patrick's Day, in 1998.
I firmly believe that playing a pussified hybrid schedule is not in your best interest next season. I have wondered if Penn State would have been better off this season, a down year in the Big 10, had they not done this in '12-'13. They followed that season up with an 8-26-2 record last season, the first season they played a "real" schedule.
If they had thrown themselves to the dogs that first season, would they be better off this season? I say yes.
I firmly believe that ASU will be better off if they schedule "up" and not "down", in the long run.
It's hard to soar like eagles when you are flying with a flock of turkeys.
Just my historical perspective on the topic.
Comment