PDA

View Full Version : Boston College Eagles 2013-2014 season thread -Speed returns to The Heights



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

J.D.
11-14-2013, 09:07 PM
Nice job by billett. Exactly the kind of game I expected.

mookie1995
11-14-2013, 09:27 PM
now.... just exactly HOW DID BC WIN TONIGHT?!?!?!?! :D

J.D.
11-14-2013, 09:29 PM
I don't understand the question

mookie1995
11-14-2013, 09:38 PM
I don't understand the question

from twitter it reads as though umass scored a goal that then went under review because umass was offsides some time before the goal was scored.... something new

J.D.
11-14-2013, 09:43 PM
Nah I remember it happening just a few years ago in merrimack-unh hockey east semifinal

Definitely rare though

mookie1995
11-14-2013, 09:49 PM
hmmmmm

J.D.
11-14-2013, 09:57 PM
http://www.uscho.com/recaps/2011/03/18/sheen-nets-two-merrimack-gets-to-hockey-east-final-by-ousting-new-hampshire/

It seemed like the Warriors had a collective case of opening-night jitters, as goaltender Joe Cannata had trouble fielding a soft shot from Wildcats defender Blake Kessel from center ice only 30 seconds into the game. Fortunately for Merrimack, officials reviewed the play and determined that a UNH player was offsides when Kessel scored and revoked the goal.

“Good thing I’m not a shortstop,” Cannata said. “I guess it took a lucky bounce, but we were lucky [UNH] was offsides.”

The Wildcats officially got on the board seven minutes later, moments after the Warriors successfully killed Sheen’s hooking penalty.

mookie1995
11-14-2013, 10:16 PM
Is that what happened? A shot from outside the blue line? Or was the goal scored in the zone after a couple seconds of play

J.D.
11-14-2013, 10:31 PM
"game officials may use replay to correct an error on calling an offside or too many players on the ice that directly leads to a goal." (found that in the rule book)

J.D.
11-14-2013, 10:32 PM
the bottom line is that offsides is in fact reviewable. i'd have to imagine this one was pretty blatant.

TonyTheTiger20
11-14-2013, 10:48 PM
http://www.bcinterruption.com/boston-college-hockey-2013-14-season/2013/11/14/5106542/goal-by-goal-7-boston-college-hockey-wins-ugly-at-umass-2-1

Recap that includes a GIF of the offsides in question

CollegeHockeyRinkReport
11-14-2013, 10:51 PM
"game officials may use replay to correct an error on calling an offside or too many players on the ice that directly leads to a goal." (found that in the rule book)

I don't have the rulebook right in front of me…and I'm a neutral observer so I don't have a feeling one way or another, but at one time the rule stated that offsides calls could only be reviewed in post-season play. I believe that is no longer the rule, but that is where the confusion came regarding UMass' displeasure.

J.D.
11-14-2013, 10:53 PM
good work tony. here it is in the rule book:

A team may use its timeout for the purpose of reviewing situations that
are in the video replay criteria or a potentially non-detected goal. If the
challenge is successful, the team retains its timeout. This timeout policy
applies to any video replay procedure used.
The on-ice official makes the final decision.


Very interesting

J.D.
11-14-2013, 10:55 PM
I don't have the rulebook right in front of me…and I'm a neutral observer so I don't have a feeling one way or another, but at one time the rule stated that offsides calls could only be reviewed in post-season play. I believe that is no longer the rule, but that is where the confusion came regarding UMass' displeasure.

gotcha. certainly intriguing, especially the new wrinkle of being able to call a timeout in order to "challenge" something.

CollegeHockeyRinkReport
11-15-2013, 12:13 AM
http://www.sbncollegehockey.com/2013/11/14/5106708/boston-college-holds-off-umass-controversial-call-no-goal-offsides-brian-billett-mac-haight/in/4868569

Recap linked above. Not much to add except a few quotes from York, Micheletto and Troy Power. I have to say I was very impressed with the class that Troy Power handled himself with in post game press conference even after being egged on by the UMass media contingent.

sterlippo1
11-15-2013, 04:40 AM
Is mookie referring to the offsides by BC ( he claims) on Arnold's goal in the OT beanpot final in 2012?

claver2010
11-15-2013, 07:35 AM
Always good to get a road W in conference regardless of opponent.

90 seconds in a 1 goal game on the road to kill a penalty and who does York send out? Arnold & Cangelosi. Says a lot about Cangelosi, I remember in a similar situation Arnold's FR year York sent him out.

Let's hit the quarter pole of conference play undefeated.

Nick Papagiorgio
11-15-2013, 08:02 AM
Roads wins at Umass in front of those foul mouthed nitwits are never easy to come by.

Team needs to stay out of the box. Matheson really is a knucklehead with the number of penalties he takes.

edit - their fans want the coaches to protest this game. Ahahahahahhhahahahaha.

ps - DOWN WITH DONAHUE! One last nugget of turd Bates needs to clean up that Gene left us.

sterlippo1
11-15-2013, 08:08 AM
ps - DOWN WITH DONAHUE!

Agree 100%, just said it to a friend. I thought he had a shot here but clearly it's not working

Aerman
11-15-2013, 08:09 AM
http://www.uscho.com/recaps/2011/03/18/sheen-nets-two-merrimack-gets-to-hockey-east-final-by-ousting-new-hampshire/

It seemed like the Warriors had a collective case of opening-night jitters, as goaltender Joe Cannata had trouble fielding a soft shot from Wildcats defender Blake Kessel from center ice only 30 seconds into the game. Fortunately for Merrimack, officials reviewed the play and determined that a UNH player was offsides when Kessel scored and revoked the goal.

“Good thing I’m not a shortstop,” Cannata said. “I guess it took a lucky bounce, but we were lucky [UNH] was offsides.”

The Wildcats officially got on the board seven minutes later, moments after the Warriors successfully killed Sheen’s hooking penalty.

Never really understood the call. It was certainly offsides when the puck came into the zone, but not by the time it entered the goal. DeSimone (I think) had cleared the zone first. If Cannata had stopped it, play would have continued.