most successful program - next year

[NEWI Badger Fan]

Re: most successful program - next year

I don't know about you guys, but I'm digging lamb lately. Whether it is a shank, blade or chop, I prepare a merlot reduction to drizzle over the lamb. Darn yummy.

[cross cheque]

Re: most successful program - next year

If you're lucky, you can unlock "Hirsch Mode", and attack inadimate objects.

Haha inanimate? Congratulations you've created a new word.

[MinnesotaNorthStar]

Re: most successful program - next year

If you use the JDUBBS cheat code, Gophers get 99 while everyone else gets 0.

You want to be careful using this though, because they'll just go around in circles and not really do anything, even though they'll they think they are...

[bigblue_dl]

Re: most successful program - next year

Haha inanimate? Congratulations you've created a new word.

Yup, I did.

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: most successful program - next year

I don't know about you guys, but I'm digging lamb lately. Whether it is a shank, blade or chop, I prepare a merlot reduction to drizzle over the lamb. Darn yummy.

Where's... the lamb... SAUCE?!

[MavHockey14]

Everyone except Union, which has a ranking of 26.

You read it wrong. They're a 6. The rest of the ECAC is 26.

[MavHockey14]

Haha inanimate? Congratulations you've created a new word.

Best part? You looked it up to make sure.

[bigblue_dl]

Re: most successful program - next year

Its a made up video game, is there really a problem with having madeup and mispelled words?


(yes, the missing s was on perpose)

[J.D.]

Re: most successful program - next year

The program that wins the national title next year will be the most successful.

[SCSU Euro]

Re: most successful program - next year

If you use the JDUBBS cheat code, Gophers get 99 while everyone else gets 0.

Not true... if you're from Minnesota you score an 80. However if you're a Canadian over the age 22, you get negative points.

[DaveStPaul]

Re: most successful program - next year

If you're lucky, you can unlock "Hirsch Mode", and attack inadimate objects.

Haha inanimate? Congratulations you've created a new word.

I just assumed he had a code in his node.

[Jon]

Re: most successful program - next year

Sometimes I fantasize about a nice steak. Medium rare. Crispy fries. Tossed salad. Nice glass of cabernet sauvignon. Chocolate lava cake for dessert.

I'd settle for some fava beans and a nice chianti.


*evil laugh*

[Stauber1]

Re: most successful program - next year

Which DI teams will have the most and highest rated NHL draft picks on their rosters in next year's Frozen Four?"

Do you think you are being clever? The point you're making is tired, old and quite frankly without any significant implication.

You think the ECAC, and more precisely the Ivy League, are somehow in greater compliance with the the "spirit" of college athletics. So what, then, is the meaning of this all-ECAC final? Does it show that adhering to the "spirit" (as you perceive it) of college athletics dictate success at a higher rate than adherence to other values? Is it some sort of divine intervention? Does it imply some sort of moral imperative?

Or are you just taking this as an opportunity to reinforce your delusions of superiority?

For what it's worth, I think you are horribly obtuse in your opinion that teams from the ECAC somehow choose to operate their programs with fewer NHL draft picks. If a quantity of guys who had a lot of NHL stock wanted to go to ECAC schools, there would be a quantity of NHL draft picks in the ECAC.

[Osorojo]

Re: most successful program - next year

Do you think you are being clever? The point you're making is tired, old and quite frankly without any significant implication.

You think the ECAC, and more precisely the Ivy League, are somehow in greater compliance with the the "spirit" of college athletics. So what, then, is the meaning of this all-ECAC final? Does it show that adhering to the "spirit" (as you perceive it) of college athletics dictate success at a higher rate than adherence to other values? Is it some sort of divine intervention? Does it imply some sort of moral imperative?

Or are you just taking this as an opportunity to reinforce your delusions of superiority?

For what it's worth, I think you are horribly obtuse in your opinion that teams from the ECAC somehow choose to operate their programs with fewer NHL draft picks. If a quantity of guys who had a lot of NHL stock wanted to go to ECAC schools, there would be a quantity of NHL draft picks in the ECAC.

Fact: Some fans and apparently some programs believe recruiting more and higher draft picks is essential to success.
Fact: Teams with more and higher draft picks were NOT successful in this year's playoff tournament - even teams with FIVE TIMES as many draft picks as their opponent.
Fact: SCSU [not ECAC] had a fine season with just five draft picks.

Nothing cute here- just reality. Why did ECAC teams and SCSU have relatively few draft picks? I have no idea, but the reason doesn't change their record. At least consider the possibility that acquiring the maximum number of draft picks may not be critically important to the performance of college hockey teams.

BTW: Beginning a sentence with "You think . . ." does not improve its credibility.

[bigblue_dl]

Re: most successful program - next year

BTW: Beginning a sentence with "You think . . ." does not improve its credibility.

Listen to this, folks. This guy is the expert on lacking credibility.