Can somebody please tell me why this tournament is in Kansas City, MO? There are about 300-500 fans at what should be a good season opener with some quality teams. If it's based on a neutral location why not St. Louis at least which has an NHL team and hockey fan base?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ice Breaker Tournament
Collapse
X
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by still an empty net View PostCan somebody please tell me why this tournament is in Kansas City, MO? There are about 300-500 fans at what should be a good season opener with some quality teams. If it's based on a neutral location why not St. Louis at least which has an NHL team and hockey fan base?
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by NotreDameFan27 View PostNotre Dame vs. Nebraska (Omaha) in the finals. Who you got?
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by IrishHockeyFan View PostSt. Louis? Are you kidding? The attendance at the 2011 West Regional final (a game that mattered a little bit more) was so abysmal the official crowd number was never announced. The fact is these college games at neutral sites rarely come close to filling the stands.
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by IrishHockeyFan View PostIf Notre Dame plays to the extent of their talent, the Irish should win. If they don't quickly learn how to finish repeated good long forechecks with goals a little more often, UNO will win.
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
From what I saw of the games, I'd say Irish.Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by Driftryder View PostI watched the UNO Army game last night and the crowd was non-existent, ouch.Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Whoah. Did I see the WCHA "A Team" officiating the first game? Hunt/Shep?? The almighties??? I take it UNO is the host school then? I was wondering why the heck they'd bring in the goldenchild Shep for this tourny.......I want to be a fan of the best team in college hockey - so that explains why I am a DENVER fan!
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by 32 Degrees! View PostWhoah. Did I see the WCHA "A Team" officiating the first game? Hunt/Shep?? The almighties??? I take it UNO is the host school then? I was wondering why the heck they'd bring in the goldenchild Shep for this tourny.......
The announced crowd yesterday was 2200 of which at least 3/4 were UNO fans. There was a smattering of Maine jerseys in evidence, a fair number of Notre Dame jerseys, and there was a surprising number of Army fans at the game. Oddly, there was a very noticeable amount of Fighting Sioux fans, too. I even saw some Wisconsin gear. I'd expect the championship game to be "better" attended.
The City of Kansas City and the local sponsors of the event should be ashamed of themselves. I am staying at the Holiday Inn Aladdin 4 blocks form the arena and I haven't talked to a single local that even knows the tournament is going on. There was a huge pep rally in the Power & Light District (right across the street from the arena) last night for the MU/Alabama game today and I bet there were more people there than at the tournament. There was no talk about it at all on local sports talk radio driving down here yesterday and the Kansas City Star only has a synopsis of the 1st game online, even, nothing about the 2nd game at all.
The Sprint Center doesn't have very good hockey sight lines, IMHO. The upper level looks steeper, even, that the Clink in Omaha, too.
Army looked totally over-matched against UNO. There was never any sense at all that Army was ever a part of the game. I told my wife halfway through the first period that it looked like Army would be lucky to score, and, they were, they got a somewhat fluky goal and didn't get shut out. UNO looked like they kind of lost interest once they got to 4 goals in the 2nd period and the rest of the game sorta got mailed in.
If there is a bigger defense corp in college hockey than UNO's, I'd sure like to know whose it is. Six defensemen 6' 2" or bigger including guys that are 6' 7" and 6' 8"?
Ought to be a good one with the Domers. Off to the arena.
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by IrishHockeyFan View PostSt. Louis? Are you kidding? The attendance at the 2011 West Regional final (a game that mattered a little bit more) was so abysmal the official crowd number was never announced. The fact is these college games at neutral sites rarely come close to filling the stands.
I live in Syracuse, NY so if I was having a tournament here I would do my best as an organizer to pull Cornell ( 1hr 15 minutes), RIT ( 1 hr 15 minutes), Clarkson or St. Lawrence (2 hrs 15 minutes), and then try to get a Vermont (4 hours), UNH, or a Mass. school (BC, BU, Northeastern, Lowell,) 5 hours. Although I have two schools from the ECAC, I believe I would still get a respectable crowd because of the easy travel.
That being said I understand a lot of cities do not have that many teams within that distance of a venue but tournaments should try to pull two teams that are relatively close and have good fan bases as a starting point.
Comment
-
Re: Ice Breaker Tournament
Originally posted by still an empty net View PostWell I stand corrected. I guess we can both agree then that having these tournaments at neutral sites in which teams really are not close (besides UNO) to the venue is not a good idea. These tournaments like to obviously have teams from different conferences in them but when that happens travel becomes further and further and attendance drops drastically. The lack of fans at that tournament is not going to appeal to a non college hockey fan. In my opinion it is crucial to have tournaments in which the attendance is at least respectable even if it means having two teams from the same conference play in the tournament. They could arrange it so they don't play the first game. It is all about location here. You have to make sure at least two of the teams which normally have a decent fan base at home games are within three (maybe 4) hours of the venue otherwise you will get a complete lack of attendance and lack of interest in the sport.
I live in Syracuse, NY so if I was having a tournament here I would do my best as an organizer to pull Cornell ( 1hr 15 minutes), RIT ( 1 hr 15 minutes), Clarkson or St. Lawrence (2 hrs 15 minutes), and then try to get a Vermont (4 hours), UNH, or a Mass. school (BC, BU, Northeastern, Lowell,) 5 hours. Although I have two schools from the ECAC, I believe I would still get a respectable crowd because of the easy travel.
That being said I understand a lot of cities do not have that many teams within that distance of a venue but tournaments should try to pull two teams that are relatively close and have good fan bases as a starting point.
I think the problem, though, is more a function of how "provincial" college hockey is. The teams that do better in attendance and/or exposure are teams with strong local fanbases (Minnesota, Boston College, Michigan, etc.) that they can draw from and are willing to travel with the team. Teams with smaller pools of local fans obviously fare worse. Thus, there really isn't a national following for the sport itself. This could change with an improved focus, and maybe the new national TV contracts will help in this way, but so far success in this area has been limited.
It's too bad because college hockey is actually very entertaining.
Comment
Comment