Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 17
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 template Next
  • #76
    Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

    Originally posted by IceIsNice View Post
    Okay, my turn.... "I was wondering why".......

    there's no USA Hockey poll this week?
    I haven't seen one all season. When I tried looking directly on USA Today one week, I couldn't find it on that site.
    "... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
    And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling

    Comment

    • #77
      Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

      Originally posted by ARM View Post
      I haven't seen one all season. When I tried looking directly on USA Today one week, I couldn't find it on that site.
      http://usahockey.com/players/polls.aspx
      Take a peek, it's been here all season, including links to all previous weeks, but for some reason there isn't one this week.
      Toe Blake On goalies: "You get four goals off them, or five, but the goal you've got to have to win, somehow the great ones don't let you get it.”

      Comment

      • #78
        Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

        Originally posted by IceIsNice View Post
        http://usahockey.com/players/polls.aspx
        Take a peek, it's been here all season, including links to all previous weeks, but for some reason there isn't one this week.
        Odd numbering schemes as well:

        Women's Oct 30 poll is "Week 6", while Men's Nov 5th poll is "Week 5". (BTW Women's "Week 5" is Oct 23).

        Comment

        • #79
          Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

          Originally posted by DC78-82 View Post
          I was wondering why, after being swept by SLU, why SLU gets a vote, and on the heels of a 5 game losing streak, UNH gets 2 any?
          DC....You are underselling the Wildcats. Should be obvious to you. SLU sweeping those mighty Wildcats will garner some votes.

          More seriously.....SLU's set of past opponents and their rankings have a lot to do with it. All their past opponents they lost to, swept last weekend (except Clarky, but they moved up anyways), so that tends to improve your stock as well, as long as you do the same.

          Comment

          • #80
            Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

            Originally posted by IceIsNice View Post
            http://usahockey.com/players/polls.aspx
            Take a peek, it's been here all season, including links to all previous weeks, but for some reason there isn't one this week.
            I get an "F" in "looking". Maybe they figured that since so many of the ranked teams had a bye this week they would take one as well. Either that, or Katey Stone is one of the voters and she didn't get her vote in because 4 Nations.

            Originally posted by OnMAA View Post
            Odd numbering schemes as well:

            Women's Oct 30 poll is "Week 6", while Men's Nov 5th poll is "Week 5". (BTW Women's "Week 5" is Oct 23).
            The women's season starts a couple weeks before the men's season does.
            "... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
            And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling

            Comment

            • #81
              Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

              http://www.uscho.com/rankings/d-i-womens-poll/

              Certainly a slightly unusual appearing poll from the WCHA point of view.
              Minnesota Hockey

              Comment

              • #82
                Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                Originally posted by brookyone View Post
                http://www.uscho.com/rankings/d-i-womens-poll/

                Certainly a slightly unusual appearing poll from the WCHA point of view.
                Brooky, check out the PairWise for the most glaring omission I've ever seen (no Minnesota?!?).

                Comment

                • #83
                  Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                  Originally posted by osualum86 View Post
                  Brooky, check out the PairWise for the most glaring omission I've ever seen (no Minnesota?!?).
                  They seem to have been having software problems with the Pairwise calculations. Minnesota and Harvard have dropped in and out of the PWR for weeks now.

                  Comment

                  • #84
                    Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                    Originally posted by brookyone View Post
                    Certainly a slightly unusual appearing poll from the WCHA point of view.
                    I'm not sure about the justification for BC to be 5th and UMD to get no votes at all. I suppose if you squint just right and don't think too hard, 4-3-1 looks enough better than 3-6-1 that you might arrive at it, but it requires a fair amount of willful avoidance of asking who the two teams have actually played. The performance of New Hampshire against various opponents of the two squads as well as BC itself suggests that they are a lot closer to each other than the voters think. KRACH agrees, having BC at 13 and UMD at 15.

                    Comment

                    • #85
                      Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                      Originally posted by Eeyore View Post
                      I suppose if you squint just right and don't think too hard, 4-3-1 looks enough better than 3-6-1.
                      You are kidding right. Without looking at opponents, 4-3-1 is a much better record than 3-6-1.

                      Comment

                      • #86
                        Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                        Can't believe I'm going to say this...But the team I feel should be complaining is Wisconsin. Should be higher. If they were a East team they would be top 5

                        Comment

                        • #87
                          Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                          Originally posted by Eeyore View Post
                          They seem to have been having software problems with the Pairwise calculations. Minnesota and Harvard have dropped in and out of the PWR for weeks now.
                          What I want to know is does someone have a plan to fix the software? And how will anyone know if all the glitches really are fixed?
                          Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey

                          Comment

                          • #88
                            Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                            Originally posted by D2D View Post
                            What I want to know is does someone have a plan to fix the software? And how will anyone know if all the glitches really are fixed?
                            Wouldn't it be *** awesome if it never got fixed, and even the NCAA missed it? A field of 8 at the of the season with NO WCHA teams!!! Nirvana!!!!

                            Toe Blake On goalies: "You get four goals off them, or five, but the goal you've got to have to win, somehow the great ones don't let you get it.”

                            Comment

                            • #89
                              Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                              Originally posted by IceIsNice View Post
                              Wouldn't it be *** awesome if it never got fixed, and even the NCAA missed it? A field of 8 at the of the season with NO WCHA teams!!! Nirvana!!!!
                              Yeah, maybe an Eastern team would finally win one!
                              Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey

                              Comment

                              • #90
                                Re: Women's DI Rankings/Polls 2012-2013

                                Originally posted by IceIsNice View Post
                                Wouldn't it be *** awesome if it never got fixed, and even the NCAA missed it? A field of 8 at the of the season with NO WCHA teams!!!
                                Understandably, the CHA fan has forgotten all about automatic bids.

                                Anyway, Ed Trefzger fixed the USCHO PWR computation.
                                Last edited by ARM; 11-13-2012, 01:27 AM.
                                "... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
                                And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 template Next
                                Working...
                                X