Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

    Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
    Sorry, UW doesn't have more titles. And it wouldn't matter if they did. They have far less history and virtually no tradition. They are a plug-n-play program that owes it's existence to Minnesota. All of their coaches have had MN connections, they have relied heavily on MN players, their only real tradition is being so tied to Minnesota
    Wisconsin does have more NCAA titles. They have six. Minnesota has five. You are poor at math. Thanks for confirming.
    National Champions: 2012, 2010, 2008, 2001, 1949
    Hockey East Tournament Champions: 2012, 2011, 2010, 2008, 2007, 2005, 2001, 1999, 1998, 1990, 1987
    Hockey East Regular Season Champions: 2014, 2012, 2011, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2001, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1987, 1986, 1985


    Originally posted by SteveF
    two things you need to know about the current state of BU hockey

    a) fanboys chanted 'thank you seniors' at the beanpot
    b) fanboys chanted 'wheres your beanpot' while getting blown out in the semis of the HE tournament

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by REDMEN2002 View Post
      Wisconsin does have more NCAA titles. They have six. Minnesota has five. You are poor at math. Thanks for confirming.
      We don't apologize for playing hockey when you didn't have a team

      Minnesota has 7 titles. 5 NCAA. You're welcome for the history lesson.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

        Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
        Only one school has. Johns Hopkins.
        You sure about that one?
        2005-2006: 7-25-6
        2006-2007: 18-17-5
        2007-2008: 14-20-5
        2008-2009: 6-25-7
        2009-2010: 5-30-1

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by bose301s View Post
          You sure about that one?
          About what?

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

            Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
            We don't apologize for playing hockey when you didn't have a team

            Minnesota has 7 titles. 5 NCAA. You're welcome for the history lesson.
            This is NCAA hockey, no? Mickey mouse titles from the dark ages aren't legitimate. Minnesota has five titles. Wisconsin has six. Soon Boston College will have more than Minnesota. I'm sorry your world is crashing down on top of you.
            National Champions: 2012, 2010, 2008, 2001, 1949
            Hockey East Tournament Champions: 2012, 2011, 2010, 2008, 2007, 2005, 2001, 1999, 1998, 1990, 1987
            Hockey East Regular Season Champions: 2014, 2012, 2011, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2001, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1987, 1986, 1985


            Originally posted by SteveF
            two things you need to know about the current state of BU hockey

            a) fanboys chanted 'thank you seniors' at the beanpot
            b) fanboys chanted 'wheres your beanpot' while getting blown out in the semis of the HE tournament

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

              Originally posted by REDMEN2002 View Post
              This is NCAA hockey, no? Mickey mouse titles from the dark ages aren't legitimate. Minnesota has five titles. Wisconsin has six. Soon Boston College will have more than Minnesota. I'm sorry your world is crashing down on top of you.
              Also don't forget Michigan, North Dakota and Denver also all have more than Minnesota does.
              2005-2006: 7-25-6
              2006-2007: 18-17-5
              2007-2008: 14-20-5
              2008-2009: 6-25-7
              2009-2010: 5-30-1

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

                Solo - Answer this, then we can talk about whether UW is worthy of playing UMN. But until you address the hypocrisy in being mad at me for doing something fans in your own fanbase just recently did, I will not entertain any of your points:


                Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
                Is it ok for your fanbase to say you're too good for SCSU, Bemidji, and Mankato, but not ok for me to express my firm belief that the Gophers are too good for UW?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

                  Originally posted by bose301s View Post
                  Also don't forget Michigan, North Dakota and Denver also all have more than Minnesota does.
                  Oh, I haven't forgotten. It's just that Dubbie has a thing for Wisconsin. But of course, you're right. Michigan > Minnesota, North Dakota > Minnesota and Denver > Minnesota.
                  National Champions: 2012, 2010, 2008, 2001, 1949
                  Hockey East Tournament Champions: 2012, 2011, 2010, 2008, 2007, 2005, 2001, 1999, 1998, 1990, 1987
                  Hockey East Regular Season Champions: 2014, 2012, 2011, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2001, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1987, 1986, 1985


                  Originally posted by SteveF
                  two things you need to know about the current state of BU hockey

                  a) fanboys chanted 'thank you seniors' at the beanpot
                  b) fanboys chanted 'wheres your beanpot' while getting blown out in the semis of the HE tournament

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by REDMEN2002 View Post
                    This is NCAA hockey, no? Mickey mouse titles from the dark ages aren't legitimate. Minnesota has five titles. Wisconsin has six. Soon Boston College will have more than Minnesota. I'm sorry your world is crashing down on top of you.
                    Haha...... Sorry, but your opinion on pre-NCAA hockey means little to me. If my team was brutal in the pre-NCAA era, I would probably try and delegitimize it too.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

                      Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
                      Solo - Answer this, then we can talk about whether UW is worthy of playing UMN. But until you address the hypocrisy in being mad at me for doing something fans in your own fanbase just recently did, I will not entertain any of your points:
                      It's not valid when Minnesota's hockey legacy is less than that of Wisconsin's, again, in case you are stupid, 6 NCAA Titles > 5 NCAA Titles.
                      2005-2006: 7-25-6
                      2006-2007: 18-17-5
                      2007-2008: 14-20-5
                      2008-2009: 6-25-7
                      2009-2010: 5-30-1

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

                        Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
                        Haha...... Sorry, but your opinion on pre-NCAA hockey means little to me. If my team was brutal in the pre-NCAA era, I would probably try and delegitimize it too.
                        Your opinion means nothing to nobody. Just trying to do you a favor to set you straight. Be humble. Realize the Gophers historically have come up short thus far vs Wisconsin, Michigan, North Dakota and Denver. It's okay, not the end of the world.
                        National Champions: 2012, 2010, 2008, 2001, 1949
                        Hockey East Tournament Champions: 2012, 2011, 2010, 2008, 2007, 2005, 2001, 1999, 1998, 1990, 1987
                        Hockey East Regular Season Champions: 2014, 2012, 2011, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2001, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1987, 1986, 1985


                        Originally posted by SteveF
                        two things you need to know about the current state of BU hockey

                        a) fanboys chanted 'thank you seniors' at the beanpot
                        b) fanboys chanted 'wheres your beanpot' while getting blown out in the semis of the HE tournament

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by bose301s View Post
                          It's not valid when Minnesota's hockey legacy is less than that of Wisconsin's, again, in case you are stupid, 6 NCAA Titles > 5 NCAA Titles.
                          I've already addressed that point. I won't do it again. Go back and read my previous responses.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

                            Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
                            Haha...... Sorry, but your opinion on pre-NCAA hockey means little to me. If my team was brutal in the pre-NCAA era, I would probably try and delegitimize it too.
                            Do you see what you just did There?
                            "My greatest achievement."
                            Dirty on getting me suspended from USCHO.

                            I'm not an alcoholic! I'm an independent beer taster for Anheuser Busch.

                            Happy~Smelling like a warm turd sandwich since 11/15/07.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: MN Hockey - "We're So SPECIAL!"

                              Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
                              I've already addressed that point. I won't do it again. Go back and read my previous responses.
                              The problem is your points are 100% invalid.
                              2005-2006: 7-25-6
                              2006-2007: 18-17-5
                              2007-2008: 14-20-5
                              2008-2009: 6-25-7
                              2009-2010: 5-30-1

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by bose301s View Post
                                The problem is your points are 100% invalid.
                                The feeling is very much mutual about your points.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X