Originally posted by HumRsky
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NCAA era Program rankings-accomplishments only
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gurtholfin View PostSeriously? YOU are going to say that?
For instance, in my opinion your favorite program pales in all things that make my favorite program unique, significant, and great. But that's just the opinion of myself and many others. You are fully entitled to believe your plug-and-play program is neat-o if you'd like
Comment
-
Re: NCAA era Program rankings-accomplishments only
Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View PostIt doesn't bother me. I just don't understand people's need to quantify greatness.#OneKnight
Comment
-
Originally posted by KnightsOfTheRound View PostIt's the offseason, and this is a discussion board. People are looking for things to discuss, and in that regard, this thread was a great success. If you disagree with the OP's methodology you could at least say why and propose a better one. If you think the whole endeavor is a waste of time, then why post at all? That is what I find truly hard to understand.
In your opinion, is there a way to put into a mathmatical formula every factor that makes a program great?
Comment
-
Re: NCAA era Program rankings-accomplishments only
Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View PostIn your opinion, is there a way to put into a mathmatical formula every factor that makes a program great?#OneKnight
Comment
-
Originally posted by KnightsOfTheRound View PostObviously there's never going to be a perfect formula that pleases everyone. But I get a kick out of these threads anyway, and they always generate good debate. Considering that the OP never claimed his formula was perfect and posted it in order to generate critiques, it just strikes me as dumping on the discussion come in here and declare the whole endeavor a waste.
Comment
-
Re: NCAA era Program rankings-accomplishments only
Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View PostAnd I think 95% of what you say is less than quality. Yet, I manage to go about my business without personally attacking you.Last edited by Slap Shot; 04-15-2012, 11:45 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slap Shot View PostIt's not a personal attack. If I said you were a jerkoff that would be a personal attack, but I would never say that. You can't worry every time someone doesn't genuflect before the M because that becomes a never-ending battle. For instance I think FS23's "Top Teams" ranking severerly underrated the '02 Gophers relative to '01 UND, '06 UW and '04 UND (in fact, those 4 rankings are preposterous when you put the teams' accoplishments side by side) but I think I made one comment, maybe two at the time it came out, said ok and moved on. Look, no one can tell you what to do, but there have been friendly suggestions based upon the reactions your posts generate. Be proud of the Gophers, but do it without crapping on anyone else's program and leave that crap to fans like willythekid, socalsiouxfan and their ilk.
The rest of my comments in this thread have had NOTHING to do with the Gophers. I am just trying to understand why people find the need to quantify greatness when, in my opinion, it is a fairly subjective thing.
I think it was a valid question and I have gotten some good answers. I have also gotten a bunch of the same old attacks on my very existence which I am trying to stay above.
So, for the last time, if you don't like what I have to say, please be an adult and respectfully disagree with me, or ignore my posts. You do not have the right to tell me what I can and cannot say.
Comment
-
Re: NCAA era Program rankings-accomplishments only
Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View PostAgain, just my opinion. I have never claimed to have a monopoly on being right#OneKnight
Comment
-
Originally posted by KnightsOfTheRound View PostFor the record, I think you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who believes it is possible to exactly quantify greatness with a single perfect formula. But that doesn't mean it isn't fun to try anyway. Maybe that is what bothers me: not that you are asking questions, but you are asking an unnecessary question, since all these formulas are posted with the caveat that they are just one person's opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View PostYou're right, this is the offseason, and this is a message board. I think my question was a fair one. And the reason I posted the question is because I am genuinely interested in answers to that question.
In your opinion, is there a way to put into a mathmatical formula every factor that makes a program great?Originally posted by SJHoveyPretty sure this post, made on January 3, 2016, when UNO was 14-3-1 and #2 in the pairwise, will go down in USCHO lore as The Curse of Tipsy McStagger.Originally posted by BrenthovenWe mourn for days after a loss, puff out our chests for a week or more after we win. We brave the cold for tailgates, our friends know not to ask about the game after a tough loss, we laugh, we cry, we BLEED hockey, specifically the maroon'n'gold. Many of us have a tattoo waiting in the wings, WHEN (not IF) the Gophers are champions again.
Comment
Comment